Suppr超能文献

老年痴呆症中的血管扩张剂:文献综述

Vasodilators in senile dementias: a review of the literature.

作者信息

Yesavage J A, Tinklenberg J R, Hollister L E, Berger P A

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979 Feb;36(2):220-3. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780020110012.

Abstract

The rationale for the use of vasodilators in the aged has changed from the attempt to increase cerebral blood flow to the attempt to improve cerebral metabolism. Review of 102 studies of eight vasodilators showed that significantly more controlled studies claimed practical clinical benefit from drugs supposed to improve neuronal intermediary metabolism with secondary vasodilatation than from drugs supposed to have only vasodilator action (P less than .005). Studies of both classes of drugs often suffered from poor study design, inappropriate and inconsistent application of outcome measurements, as well as negative bias due to selection of severely demented subjects. Future studies should be placebo-controlled investigations of drugs with primarily metabolic action, address questions of dose and time response, consistently use appropriate outcome measurement, and concentrate on the elderly in whom cognitive improvement is possible.

摘要

老年人使用血管扩张剂的理论依据已从试图增加脑血流量转变为试图改善脑代谢。对8种血管扩张剂的102项研究进行回顾发现,与仅具有血管扩张作用的药物相比,更多的对照研究表明,那些被认为可改善神经元中间代谢并继发血管扩张的药物具有实际临床益处(P<0.005)。这两类药物的研究往往存在研究设计不佳、结局测量应用不当且不一致,以及因选择重度痴呆患者而产生的阴性偏倚等问题。未来的研究应以安慰剂对照的方式,对主要具有代谢作用的药物进行研究,解决剂量和时间反应问题,始终如一地使用适当的结局测量方法,并专注于有可能改善认知功能的老年人。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验