平权行动：究竟何为公平？
Affirmative action: what's really fair?
作者信息
Thayer R
出版信息
Hospitals. 1979 Apr 16;53(8):88-9, 92.
PMID:422158
Abstract
The concept of affirmative action has been the subject of much controversy in the past. Opponents of the concept believe that it provides preferential treatment for minorities and females based upon factors of race and sex that are both unconstitutional and illegal. Proponents believe the concept is needed to make up for past abuses. In this article, the author attempts to illustrate how an objective affirmative action program can enhance a hospital's personnel development system.
摘要
过去，平权行动的概念一直备受争议。该概念的反对者认为，它基于种族和性别的因素为少数群体和女性提供了优惠待遇，这既违宪又违法。支持者则认为，这个概念对于弥补过去的弊端是必要的。在本文中，作者试图说明一个客观的平权行动计划如何能够提升医院的人事发展体系。
相似文献
1
Affirmative action: what's really fair?平权行动：究竟何为公平？
Hospitals. 1979 Apr 16;53(8):88-9, 92.
2
EEO issues in the health-care field: a roundup of recent developments.医疗保健领域的平等就业机会问题：近期发展综述
Employee Relat Law J. 1986 Autumn;12(2):241-61.
3
Feds checking for 'glass ceilings'.
Mod Healthc. 1993 Nov 15;23(46):88.
4
Affirmative action: take aim at discrimination.
Health Serv Manager. 1980 Apr;13(4):1-3.
5
Affirmative action.
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 1996 Aug-Oct;51(4):171.
6
Equal employment opportunities in hospitals.医院中的平等就业机会。
Hospitals. 1978 Sep 1;52(17):40, 42, 44.
7
More on Bakke.更多关于巴克的内容。
Pers Adm. 1978 Oct;23(10):6-8.
8
The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender.
Berkeley Womens Law J. 1994;9:9-57.
9
Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?避孕还是监禁：这幅图景有什么问题？
Stanford Law Pol Rev. 1995;7(1):67-82.
10
Hospitals can be liable when supervisors are linked to sexual harassment incidents.
Mod Healthc. 1987 Nov 6;17(23):142.
Zotero 插件