Lewis R F, Nelson R W, Eggertsen C
J Clin Psychol. 1979 Jan;35(1):54-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197901)35:1<54::aid-jclp2270350105>3.0.co;2-j.
Predicted that simple tests that require attention and motor speed would be able to differentiate paranoid schizophrenics from brain-damaged patients better than more complex, problem-solving neuropsychological tests. The strategy was to improve discrimination between schizophrenic and brain-damaged patients by selecting a schizophrenic subgroup with a recognized cognitive strong point. Fourteen organic, 14 paranoid schizophrenic, and 14 nonpsychotic psychiatric patients matched for sex, education, and IQ were tested. As predicted, the attention and speed measures differentiated the brain-damaged and paranoid groups, while the four more complex measures from the Halstead-Reitan Battery did not separate the groups. There were no significant differences between the two psychiatric groups.
预测那些需要注意力和运动速度的简单测试,相较于更复杂的解决问题的神经心理学测试,能够更好地区分偏执型精神分裂症患者和脑损伤患者。策略是通过选择一个具有公认认知优势点的精神分裂症亚组来提高精神分裂症患者和脑损伤患者之间的区分度。对14名器质性脑损伤患者、14名偏执型精神分裂症患者以及14名在性别、教育程度和智商方面匹配的非精神病性精神科患者进行了测试。正如预测的那样,注意力和速度测试能够区分脑损伤组和偏执型组,而霍尔斯特德 - 雷坦成套测验中的四项更复杂的测试未能区分这两组。两个精神科组之间没有显著差异。