• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理社会问题对整体功能损害评分的逐步回归分析。

Stepwise regression of psychosocial problems on global impairment ratings.

作者信息

Steer R A, Litwok E, Diamond H

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1979 Jan;35(1):74-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197901)35:1<74::aid-jclp2270350108>3.0.co;2-8.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(197901)35:1<74::aid-jclp2270350108>3.0.co;2-8
PMID:422734
Abstract

Calculated the correlations between the severity ratings for 27 psychosocial problems and global impairment ratings of daily functioning for 109 men and 206 women admitted to the outpatient services of a community mental health center. Controlling for sex and total number of problems rated, a stepwise regression analysis indicated that global impairment estimates were related to problems that represented thought processes, affect, and role functioning. The severity ratings for the thought process problems contributed the most variance (14%) toward the explanation of the global impairment ratings.

摘要

计算了某社区心理健康中心门诊收治的109名男性和206名女性的27个心理社会问题严重程度评分与日常功能总体损害评分之间的相关性。在控制性别和所评定问题的总数后,逐步回归分析表明,总体损害评估与代表思维过程、情感和角色功能的问题有关。思维过程问题的严重程度评分对总体损害评分的解释贡献了最大的方差(14%)。

相似文献

1
Stepwise regression of psychosocial problems on global impairment ratings.心理社会问题对整体功能损害评分的逐步回归分析。
J Clin Psychol. 1979 Jan;35(1):74-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197901)35:1<74::aid-jclp2270350108>3.0.co;2-8.
2
Global Assessment of Functioning ratings and the allocation and outcomes of mental health services.功能总体评定量表评分与心理健康服务的分配及结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jun;53(6):730-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.6.730.
3
Field trial of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale--Modified.
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;152(9):1386-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.9.1386.
4
Contributions of individual syndromes to global psychopathology ratings for mental health and substance abuse patients.
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Apr;38(2):448-51. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198204)38:2<448::aid-jclp2270380242>3.0.co;2-f.
5
Client correlates of community informant adjustment ratings.社区信息提供者调整评分的客户关联因素。
J Pers Assess. 1980 Apr;44(2):157-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4402_6.
6
Validity of Axis V of DSM-III and other measures of adaptive functioning.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1988 May;77(5):535-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb05166.x.
7
Comparison of self-ratings and therapist ratings of outpatients' psychosocial status.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000 May;188(5):297-300. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200005000-00007.
8
Use of DSM-III Axis IV in clinical practice: rating the severity of psychosocial stressors.
Psychiatry Res. 1989 Nov;30(2):201-11. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90161-3.
9
Hospital and community ratings of factors related to psychiatric patient discharge readiness.医院和社区对与精神科患者出院准备相关因素的评级。
Psychol Rep. 1969 Jun;24(3):719-20. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1969.24.3.719.
10
How specific is specific impairment?特定损伤有多具体?
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;39(9):1182-9. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200009000-00019.