Allen M G
Am J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;136(4A):444-7.
The author discusses the evolution of psychiatric peer review in Washington, D.C. In its first six years (1972-1977) the Washington Psychiatric Society Peer Review Committee evaluated 146 cases, 23 (16%) of which focused on group therapy. Eight of these cases (35%) were partially or fully denied. Most of the cases involved outpatients with neuroses or character disorders who were treated in combined group and individual therapy. The author presents specific cases illustrating group therapy issues and peer review decisions. He discusses the benefits and liabilities of peer review and emphasizes its importance as a flexible, clinically sensitive, confidential, and meaningful process.
作者探讨了华盛顿特区精神科同行评审的发展历程。在其成立的头六年(1972 - 1977年),华盛顿精神科协会同行评审委员会评估了146个案例,其中23个(16%)聚焦于团体治疗。这些案例中有8个(35%)被部分或全部否决。大多数案例涉及在团体和个体联合治疗中接受治疗的患有神经症或人格障碍的门诊患者。作者列举了具体案例来说明团体治疗问题及同行评审决定。他讨论了同行评审的益处和弊端,并强调其作为一个灵活、临床敏感度高、保密且有意义的过程的重要性。