Goldman M
Bull World Health Organ. 1969;40(3):355-64.
Six Entamoeba histolytica-like amoebae of the Laredo-type are compared with classical E. histolytica strains with regard to morphology, temperature-tolerance, response to hypotonic solutions, antigenic make-up, pathogenicity, sensitivity to drugs, and biochemistry. Sharp discontinuities are shown to exist between the 2 groups in some parameters, sufficient, under certain conditions, to justify creation of a new species designation for the Laredo-type amoebae. Nevertheless, this action is not recommended at the present time because of the small number of "aberrant" strains so far isolated, and because of the limited comparative studies so far carried out.Entamoeba moshkovskii is compared with the Laredo-type E. histolytica. No consistent distinction can be made between the 2 groups except for the sources of the strains-the former is free-living and the latter parasitic. It is therefore suggested that E. moshkovskii may actually be a parasite of the Laredo type, only incidentally encountered in free-living environments because of its wide temperature and tonicity tolerances. Since, here too, only limited studies are so far available, it is suggested that the term "moshkovskii-like E. histolytica" be used until sufficient data are accumulated to assign these amoebae to a more precise location in the taxonomic scheme.
将6株拉雷多型溶组织内阿米巴样变形虫与经典的溶组织内阿米巴菌株在形态、耐温性、对低渗溶液的反应、抗原组成、致病性、药物敏感性和生物化学方面进行了比较。结果表明,两组在某些参数上存在明显的差异,在某些条件下,这些差异足以证明应为拉雷多型变形虫设立一个新的物种名称。然而,由于迄今为止分离出的“异常”菌株数量较少,且目前进行的比较研究有限,因此目前不建议采取这一行动。将莫氏内阿米巴与拉雷多型溶组织内阿米巴进行了比较。除了菌株来源外,两组之间没有一致的区别——前者是自由生活的,后者是寄生的。因此,有人认为莫氏内阿米巴实际上可能是拉雷多型寄生虫,只是由于其广泛的温度和张力耐受性,才偶尔在自由生活环境中被发现。同样,由于目前可用的研究也有限,建议在积累足够的数据将这些变形虫在分类系统中归到更精确的位置之前,使用“莫氏内阿米巴样溶组织内阿米巴”这一术语。