Pindak F F, Schmidt J P, Kendrick J Z
Appl Microbiol. 1969 Aug;18(2):147-51. doi: 10.1128/am.18.2.147-151.1969.
Various interferon inducers are known to elicit protection against lethal or infecting doses of certain viral agents. Because of the relatively high morbidity rate of influenza and its seasonal occurrence, we wished to determine whether statolon-induced interferon might be effective in controlling this disease. Mice were treated intraperitoneally with statolon and challenged with influenza A(2) virus by the intranasal route. Although interferon was present in the serum at the time of virus administration, no change in mortality rate was observed. There was, however, a significant increase in the mean survival time of treated animals. Similar results were obtained when Newcastle disease virus was used as the interferon inducer. To determine the effect of the route of challenge, other mice were treated with statolon or Newcastle disease virus and inoculated with mengovirus by the intranasal or intraperitoneal route. The results demonstrated that the treated mice were protected to similar degree against challenge by either route. It is suggested that the relative ineffectiveness of interferon in protecting mice against influenza is due to an intrinsic characteristic of the virus itself rather than the type of interferon induced or the route of virus challenge.
已知多种干扰素诱导剂可引发针对某些病毒制剂致死剂量或感染剂量的保护作用。由于流感发病率相对较高且具有季节性,我们希望确定链孢菌素诱导的干扰素是否能有效控制这种疾病。给小鼠腹腔注射链孢菌素,然后通过鼻内途径用甲型流感(2)病毒进行攻击。尽管在给予病毒时血清中存在干扰素,但未观察到死亡率有变化。然而,经治疗的动物平均存活时间有显著增加。当使用新城疫病毒作为干扰素诱导剂时,也获得了类似的结果。为了确定攻击途径的影响,用链孢菌素或新城疫病毒处理其他小鼠,并通过鼻内或腹腔途径接种脑心肌炎病毒。结果表明,经治疗的小鼠通过任何一种途径受到攻击时都受到相似程度的保护。有人认为,干扰素在保护小鼠抵抗流感方面相对无效是由于病毒本身的内在特性,而不是所诱导的干扰素类型或病毒攻击途径。