Suppr超能文献

[内镜检查对消化肿瘤检测的前瞻性研究:刷检细胞学与组织学的比较]

[Prospective study of digestive tumor detection by endoscopy: a comparison of brush cytology and histology].

作者信息

Bron B, Massih L, Brahime G, Obradovic D, Widgren S

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Apr 21;109(16):610-2.

PMID:432592
Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic appearance, histology and brush cytology has been compared in a prospective study of 192 cases involving esogastric lesions. Macroscopic diagnosis of malignancy was more frequent in benign lesions (23/145) than in true malignancies (21/42). Histology was positive in 29/36 tumors and cytology in 23/36. In cytology there were no false negatives in esophageal tumors, but there were 52% false negatives in gastric tumors and 66% in carcinoma in situ. The combination of the 2 methods resulted in a correct diagnosis in 86% of the tumors in this study.

摘要

在一项对192例食管胃病变患者的前瞻性研究中,比较了内镜表现、组织学和刷检细胞学的诊断准确性。良性病变(23/145)中宏观诊断为恶性的情况比真正的恶性肿瘤(21/42)更常见。组织学检查在36例肿瘤中有29例呈阳性,细胞学检查在36例中有23例呈阳性。在细胞学检查中,食管肿瘤无假阴性,但胃肿瘤有52%的假阴性,原位癌有66%的假阴性。在本研究中,两种方法联合使用在86%的肿瘤中得出了正确诊断。

相似文献

6
Brush cytology in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1980 May;26(2):33-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(80)73262-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验