• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[内镜检查对消化肿瘤检测的前瞻性研究:刷检细胞学与组织学的比较]

[Prospective study of digestive tumor detection by endoscopy: a comparison of brush cytology and histology].

作者信息

Bron B, Massih L, Brahime G, Obradovic D, Widgren S

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Apr 21;109(16):610-2.

PMID:432592
Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic appearance, histology and brush cytology has been compared in a prospective study of 192 cases involving esogastric lesions. Macroscopic diagnosis of malignancy was more frequent in benign lesions (23/145) than in true malignancies (21/42). Histology was positive in 29/36 tumors and cytology in 23/36. In cytology there were no false negatives in esophageal tumors, but there were 52% false negatives in gastric tumors and 66% in carcinoma in situ. The combination of the 2 methods resulted in a correct diagnosis in 86% of the tumors in this study.

摘要

在一项对192例食管胃病变患者的前瞻性研究中,比较了内镜表现、组织学和刷检细胞学的诊断准确性。良性病变(23/145)中宏观诊断为恶性的情况比真正的恶性肿瘤(21/42)更常见。组织学检查在36例肿瘤中有29例呈阳性,细胞学检查在36例中有23例呈阳性。在细胞学检查中,食管肿瘤无假阴性,但胃肿瘤有52%的假阴性,原位癌有66%的假阴性。在本研究中,两种方法联合使用在86%的肿瘤中得出了正确诊断。

相似文献

1
[Prospective study of digestive tumor detection by endoscopy: a comparison of brush cytology and histology].[内镜检查对消化肿瘤检测的前瞻性研究:刷检细胞学与组织学的比较]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Apr 21;109(16):610-2.
2
Endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy in the diagnosis of cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract.内镜刷检细胞学和活检在上消化道癌诊断中的应用
Acta Cytol. 1980 Jul-Aug;24(4):313-8.
3
[Evaluation of endoscopy with biopsy in malignant tumors of the upper part of the digestive tract].
Tijdschr Gastroenterol. 1973;16(6):385-95.
4
Direct-vision endoscopic cytology and biopsy in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric tumors: current experience.
Acta Cytol. 1977 May-Jun;21(3):399-402.
5
[Diagnostic accuracy of biopsy and endoscopic cytology in cancer of the esophagus and stomach. Experience and analysis of error factors].
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 1981 Apr-Jun;46(2):59-62.
6
Brush cytology in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1980 May;26(2):33-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(80)73262-5.
7
Adjunctive endoscopic brush cytology in the detection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy.
Acta Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):28-34.
8
Exfoliative cytodiagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Comparison with biopsy and endoscopy.胃腺癌的脱落细胞诊断。与活检及内镜检查的比较。
Acta Cytol. 1983 Sep-Oct;27(5):485-8.
9
Prospective comparison of the value of brushings before and after biopsy in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroesophageal malignancy.
Acta Cytol. 1991 Sep-Oct;35(5):549-52.
10
Evaluation of endoscopic brush and biopsy touch smear cytology and biopsy histology in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the lower oesophagus and cardia.内镜刷检及活检印片细胞学检查与活检组织学检查在诊断下食管和贲门癌中的应用评估
J Clin Pathol. 1980 Sep;33(9):811-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.9.811.