Suppr超能文献

免疫途径对感染百日咳博德特氏菌的小鼠脑内保护作用的影响。

The influence of the route of immunization on the protection of mice infected intracerebrally with Bordetella pertussis.

作者信息

Standfast A F, Dolby J M

出版信息

J Hyg (Lond). 1972 Sep;70(3):487-501. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063075.

Abstract

The development of immunity in mice to Bordetella pertussis induced by intracerebral, intravenous or intraperitoneal vaccination was analysed in terms of the viable bacteria in the brain after intracerebral challenge, the serum antibodies, and protection against the sublethal infection of the lung that follows intranasal inoculation.A vaccine introduced intracerebrally was five to ten times more effective than that given intraperitoneally or intravenously, as measured for each route by the amount of vaccine required to protect half the mice against an intracerebral challenge 14 days later (ImD 50). Intracerebral vaccination induced higher antibody titres than vaccination by the other two routes. The survival of infected mice given 1-3 ImD 50 doses of vaccine intracerebrally 14 days before, followed a pattern similar to that after intraperitoneal or intravenous vaccination with up to 10 ImD 50 of vaccine: the numbers of organisms increased for 3 days and then declined. Injection of about four ImD 50 of vaccine intracerebrally produced a local immunity, resulting in an immediate kill of challenge organisms given 14 days later. Such an effect following intraperitoneal vaccination was achieved only against challenges with an avirulent strain. It is suggested that better stimulation of circulating antibody and local immunity in the brain together account for the better protection induced by intracerebral vaccine.Immunity to an intracerebral infection appears therefore to have at least three components, each specific for pertussis. The first, like that induced by intraperitoneal and intravenous vaccination, reaches a maximum in 2 or 3 weeks and is probably an expression of a general response by the animal operating not earlier than 3 days after infection. The second is a local immunity, appearing after the same interval. The third is a short-lived local immunity which has been described by previous workers; it immediately follows the injection intracerebrally of ten times less vaccine than that needed to protect against a challenge 14 days later and lasts only 2-3 days. The second and third types result in immediate sterilization of the infection.Mice recovering from sublethal brain infection with avirulent organisms were immune to a second infection with a virulent organism, but this was achieved not by the ability to kill the re-infecting organisms immediately on injection into the brain, but only after the 3-4 days lag such as follows intraperitoneal vaccination.

摘要

通过脑内、静脉或腹腔接种疫苗诱导小鼠对百日咳博德特氏菌产生免疫力,从脑内攻击后脑中的活菌数量、血清抗体以及对鼻内接种后肺部亚致死感染的保护作用等方面进行了分析。就保护半数小鼠免受14天后脑内攻击所需的疫苗量(半数免疫剂量,ImD 50)来衡量,脑内接种的疫苗比腹腔或静脉接种的疫苗有效五到十倍。脑内接种诱导的抗体滴度高于其他两种接种途径。在感染前14天脑内给予1 - 3 ImD 50剂量疫苗的感染小鼠的存活情况,与腹腔或静脉接种高达10 ImD 50疫苗后的模式相似:菌数增加3天,然后下降。脑内注射约4 ImD 50的疫苗产生局部免疫力,导致14天后给予的攻击菌立即被清除。腹腔接种后仅对无毒株攻击产生这种效果。提示脑内疫苗诱导更好的保护作用是由于更好地刺激了循环抗体和脑内局部免疫力。因此,对脑内感染的免疫力似乎至少有三个成分,每个成分都针对百日咳。第一个成分,与腹腔和静脉接种诱导的成分一样,在2或3周内达到最大值,可能是动物在感染后不早于3天开始的一般反应的表现。第二个成分是局部免疫力,在相同间隔后出现。第三个成分是一种短暂的局部免疫力,先前的研究者已描述过;它在脑内注射比14天后保护免受攻击所需疫苗量少十倍的疫苗后立即出现,仅持续2 - 3天。第二和第三种类型导致感染立即被清除。从无毒株引起的亚致死性脑感染中恢复的小鼠对有毒株的再次感染具有免疫力,但这不是通过将再次感染的菌注入脑内后立即将其杀死的能力实现的,而是像腹腔接种后那样经过3 - 4天的延迟才实现。

相似文献

3
Passive protection of mice against intracerebral infections with Bordetella pertussis.
J Hyg (Lond). 1972 Dec;70(4):707-18. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400022555.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验