Suppr超能文献

三种测量角膜厚度方法的比较。

A comparison of three methods for the measurement of corneal thickness.

作者信息

Azen S P, Burg K A, Smith R E, Maguen E

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979 May;18(5):535-8.

PMID:437956
Abstract

Four subjects who had never worn contact lenses underwent measurement of their corneal thickness by each of three measurement methods: Haag-Streit pachometer with/and without Mishima-Hedby attachment and the Syber specular microscope. Data were collected on three separate sessions, and at each session triplicate measurement trials were made for each method. The resulting 108 measurements were analyzed statistically. Significant differences were found among the measurement methods. Two of the methods were found to be consistent from session to session. In addition, the specular microscope was found to be the most precise method within a session. It was concluded that the specular microscope, which highly trained technicians can utilize to make the measurements, offers a valuable alternative to the measurement of corneal thickness in long-term prospective studies.

摘要

四名从未佩戴过隐形眼镜的受试者通过三种测量方法中的每一种进行角膜厚度测量

带有/不带有Mishima-Hedby附件的Haag-Streit厚度计和Syber镜面显微镜。在三个不同的时间段收集数据,并且在每个时间段对每种方法进行三次重复测量试验。对得到的108次测量进行统计学分析。发现测量方法之间存在显著差异。发现其中两种方法在各时间段之间是一致的。此外,发现镜面显微镜在一个时间段内是最精确的方法。得出的结论是,训练有素的技术人员可以使用镜面显微镜进行测量,这为长期前瞻性研究中的角膜厚度测量提供了一种有价值的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验