Suppr超能文献

“短期”与“长期”精神科住院治疗的临床效果比较。IV. 差异获益的预测因素。

Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of "short" versus "long" stay psychiatric hospitalization. IV. Predictors of differential benefit.

作者信息

Mattes J A, Klein D F, Millan D, Rosen B

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979 Mar;167(3):175-81. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197903000-00007.

Abstract

One hundred seventy-three patients were randomly assigned to LT (long term, unlimited length of stay, mean 179 days) vs. ST (short term, 90-day limit) psychiatric hospitalization. Three-year follow-up results showed few between-group differences, although LT patients tended to be rehospitalized more and had superior relative ratings of psychopathology. Demographic and clinical data did not predict differential benefit from LT or ST hospitalization. Diagnosis did not generally predict differential benefit either, except that clinically diagnosed personality disorders, given LT as opposed to ST hospitalization, had poorer role functioning and less psychiatric treatments after discharge. Patients with a history of drug abuse did worse if given LT hospitalization in terms of role functioning and rehospitalization. Overall, this study agrees with other relevant studies in indicating that hospitalization should be kept as short as feasible.

摘要

173名患者被随机分配到长期(长期,住院时间无限制,平均179天)与短期(短期,90天期限)精神科住院治疗组。三年的随访结果显示两组之间差异不大,尽管长期住院的患者往往再次住院的次数更多,且精神病理学的相对评分更高。人口统计学和临床数据无法预测长期或短期住院治疗的不同获益情况。诊断通常也无法预测不同的获益情况,除非临床诊断的人格障碍患者接受长期而非短期住院治疗,出院后其角色功能较差且接受的精神科治疗较少。有药物滥用史的患者若接受长期住院治疗,在角色功能和再次住院方面情况更差。总体而言,本研究与其他相关研究一致,表明住院时间应尽可能缩短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验