Mataika J U, Dando B C, Spears G F, Macnamara F N
J Hyg (Lond). 1971 Jun;69(2):273-86. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400021501.
A survey of microfilaraemia among the population of Vanua Levu, Taveuni and Koro islands in northern Fiji was conducted in 1968 and 1969 as a prelude to a campaign of mass treatment with diethylcarbamazine.The prevalences of microfilaraemia were found in the more moist conditions of Taveuni and Koro and on the windward southern side of Vanua Levu to be higher than on the drier northern side of Vanua Levu. On both sides of Vanua Levu prevalences were lower inland than near the coast.Under apparently similar environmental conditions those of Fijian ethnic origin exhibited a higher prevalence of microfilaraemia than that shown by Indians. This ethnic difference and a difference between the prevalences in male and female Fijians are considered to be due more to higher rates of recovery from microfilaraemia in Indians and Fijian women than to diminished exposure to mosquitoes. Mathematical models have been used as an aid to the interpretation of the data, and, where appropriate, comparison has been made with the prevalence of antibodies to dengue, an arbovirus having the same vectors.Household infections were analysed by computer techniques. Infections in large households were not proportionately higher than in small households, indicating that transmission was not intrafamilial. The clustering of infections within households, though present, was not marked. Among the occupants of outlying settlements the prevalence of microfilaraemia was relatively low indicating a lower risk of infection due to isolation.
1968年和1969年,对斐济北部瓦努阿岛、塔韦乌尼岛和科罗岛的人群进行了微丝蚴血症调查,作为乙胺嗪大规模治疗运动的前奏。发现微丝蚴血症的患病率在塔韦乌尼岛和科罗岛较潮湿的地区以及瓦努阿岛迎风的南侧高于瓦努阿岛较干燥的北侧。在瓦努阿岛两侧,内陆的患病率低于沿海地区。在明显相似的环境条件下,斐济族裔人群的微丝蚴血症患病率高于印度人。这种种族差异以及斐济男性和女性患病率的差异被认为更多是由于印度人和斐济女性从微丝蚴血症中恢复的比例较高,而不是接触蚊子的机会减少。数学模型已被用于辅助解释数据,并在适当情况下与登革热抗体的患病率进行比较,登革热是一种由相同病媒传播的虫媒病毒。通过计算机技术分析家庭感染情况。大家庭中的感染率并不比小家庭高,这表明传播不是在家庭内部发生的。家庭内部感染的聚集现象虽然存在,但并不明显。在偏远定居点的居民中,微丝蚴血症的患病率相对较低,这表明由于隔离,感染风险较低。