Suppr超能文献

医院感染率的分析及意义

Analysis and significance of nosocomial infection rates.

作者信息

Mulholland S G, Creed J, Dierauf L A, Bruun J N, Blakemore W S

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1974 Dec;180(6):827-30. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197412000-00005.

Abstract

An analysis of the systems of nosocomial infection reporting utilized in a 332 bed, urban, referral-type hospital demonstrated that physician reporting was much less reliable than a well-planned surveillance system coordinated by an infection control nurse. During 12 months' experience with the most recently devloped system, the average monthly rate of nosocomial infection was 10.7%. A prevalence survey gave a rate of 14.4%. The efficiency of reporting was close to 100% when the infection control nurse spent 100% of her time on surveillance. With a reduction in surveillance time to 75%, the efficiency of reporting fell to about 75%.

摘要

对一家拥有332张床位的城市转诊型医院所采用的医院感染报告系统进行的分析表明,医生报告的可靠性远低于由感染控制护士协调的精心规划的监测系统。在使用最新开发系统的12个月经验中,医院感染的平均月发生率为10.7%。一项现患率调查得出的发生率为14.4%。当感染控制护士将100%的时间用于监测时,报告效率接近100%。当监测时间减少到75%时,报告效率降至约75%。

相似文献

1
Analysis and significance of nosocomial infection rates.医院感染率的分析及意义
Ann Surg. 1974 Dec;180(6):827-30. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197412000-00005.
5
Nosocomial infection rates at a General Army Hospital.
Am J Surg. 1977 Sep;134(3):381-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90410-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验