Hurwitz B J, Zion M M, Obel I W
Thorax. 1974 Nov;29(6):678-84. doi: 10.1136/thx.29.6.678.
, , 678-684. Myocardial perforation as a complication of permanent endocardial pacing with flexible Elema catheters is described in nine patients. In eight patients pacing failed, but there were no other serious ill-effects. Diaphragmatic pacing occurred in five patients. Radiological evidence of movement, either posteriorly and/or laterally, of the electrode tip was detected in five patients. In only two of them was the electrode seen to be definitely extracardiac in position. A change in the pacing wave form aided the diagnosis in two patients. In a further two patients electrode tip electrocardiograms helped to confirm the diagnosis where, upon withdrawal of the perforating electrode, small Q waves disappeared, RS complexes enlarged, and the ST segments became more elevated, with deeply inverted T waves. Withdrawal and repositioning of the electrode catheters was performed in seven patients. In one, a new catheter was inserted, and in another, where uninterrupted cardiac pacing was accompanied by intermittent diaphragmatic pacing, the pacing system was left unaltered. The follow-up is from six months to four and a half years with one late death apparently unrelated to pacing failure.
……,678 - 684。本文描述了9例因使用可弯曲的埃莱玛导管进行永久性心内膜起搏而导致心肌穿孔的病例。8例患者起搏失败,但未出现其他严重不良后果。5例患者发生膈肌起搏。5例患者检测到电极尖端有向后和/或侧向移动的放射学证据。其中仅2例电极在位置上明确位于心外。起搏波形的改变帮助2例患者确诊。另外2例患者,电极尖端心电图有助于确诊,在拔出穿孔电极后,小Q波消失,RS波群增大,ST段抬高更明显,T波深倒置。7例患者进行了电极导管的拔出和重新定位。1例插入了新导管,另1例在不间断心脏起搏伴有间歇性膈肌起搏的情况下,起搏系统未作改变。随访时间为6个月至4年半,1例晚期死亡显然与起搏失败无关。