Ilett K F, Madsen B W, Woods J D
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 Jul;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/cpt19792611.
The kinetic behavior of disopyramide was studied in 20 patients with suspected myocardial infarction: in 13 of these, the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed. All received a 400-mg oral loading dose of disopyramide base followed by an oral maintenance regimen of either 100 or 200 mg 4 times daily. The elimination half-life (t1/2beta) was longer (p less than 0.05) in patients with confirmed infarction than in patients with unconfirmed infarction [38.0 +/- 3.7 hr (mean +/- SEM) compared to 24.3 +/- 0.8 hr, and 21.2 +/- 2.1 hr compared to 7.2 +/- 2.4 hr for the 100- and 200-mg maintenance dose regimens, respectively]. The t1/2beta was dose dependent for infarct and noninfarct patients. Two of the patients with confirmed infarction failed to reach trough plasma levels equal to or exceeding the lower end of the manufacturer's recommended therapeutic range (3.3 mug/ml) during the study. For the remaining 11 patients the time taken to achieve trough plasma levels of 3.3 mug/ml varied from 18 to 170 hr; hence plasma disopyramide concentration in these patients was suboptimal at a time when the risk of arrhythmias is high. Modification of existing oral loading dose regimens is therefore required for optimization of oral disopyramide therapy.
对20例疑似心肌梗死患者的丙吡胺动力学行为进行了研究:其中13例患者随后确诊。所有患者均接受了400毫克丙吡胺碱的口服负荷剂量,随后采用每日4次、每次100或200毫克的口服维持方案。确诊梗死患者的消除半衰期(t1/2β)比未确诊梗死患者更长(p<0.05)[100毫克和200毫克维持剂量方案中,确诊梗死患者的消除半衰期分别为38.0±3.7小时(均值±标准误),未确诊梗死患者为24.3±0.8小时;确诊梗死患者为21.2±2.1小时,未确诊梗死患者为7.2±2.4小时]。梗死和非梗死患者的t1/2β均呈剂量依赖性。在研究期间,2例确诊梗死患者未能达到等于或超过制造商推荐治疗范围下限(3.3微克/毫升)的谷血浆水平。对于其余11例患者,达到3.3微克/毫升谷血浆水平所需时间为18至170小时;因此,在心律失常风险较高时,这些患者的血浆丙吡胺浓度未达最佳水平。因此,需要调整现有的口服负荷剂量方案以优化丙吡胺口服治疗。