Bishop E R, Torch E M
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979 Jun;167(6):348-56.
The longstanding diagnostic controversy over the concept of "hysteria" has taken on new significance with the advent and development of the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III). The problem of defining hysteria is therefore discussed and re-examined. A retrospective study of cases diagnosed as conversion reaction or hysterical neurosis, conversion type was then completed and analyzed. These cases were redefined using DSM-III criteria and were analyzed using a number of demographic and clinical variables. In a comparison of those patients classified as having conversion and those classified as having psychalgia, no significant differences were found. Those patients under the diagnosis of conversion and those carrying the diagnosis psychalgia differed significantly from a control group of patients with random "neurotic" diagnosis on five variables: a) symptoms are defensive; b) symptoms are expressive; c) secondary gain; d) previous physical trauma; and e) previous conversion symptoms.
随着《诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)的出现和发展,长期以来关于“癔症”概念的诊断争议有了新的意义。因此,对癔症的定义问题进行了讨论和重新审视。随后完成并分析了一项对被诊断为转换反应或癔症性神经症(转换型)病例的回顾性研究。这些病例使用DSM - III标准进行重新定义,并使用一些人口统计学和临床变量进行分析。在比较被归类为患有转换障碍的患者和被归类为患有精神性疼痛的患者时,未发现显著差异。被诊断为转换障碍的患者和被诊断为精神性疼痛的患者在以下五个变量上与随机诊断为“神经症”的对照组患者有显著差异:a)症状具有防御性;b)症状具有表达性;c)继发性获益;d)既往身体创伤;e)既往转换症状。