Wetzel H, Thiemann G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1979 Dec;245(4):534-43.
The membrane feeding technique (in vitro feeding) used for the rearing of tsetse flies has advantages over the conventional method of feeding the flies on host animals. However, as long as blood remains the sole source of tsetse fly nutrition, the risk remains of blood being contaminated during collection, storage or feeding with bacteria pathogenic to the flies. The resulting high mortality of the tsetse flies endangers the success of this rearing. The experiments described here have shown that Glossina m. morsitans Westw. are more sensitive to Pseudomonas aeruginosa than G. p. palpalis Rob.-Desv. Rearing experiments over several years have confirmed this finding in that the latter species has never been threatened by high bacterial-induced mortality, whereas in 1973-74, due to contamination of the in vitro fed blood, a population of G. m. morsitans was difficult to colonize. The quantity of infected blood intake (14 to 70 mg) had no influence on the survival rate. However, when flies were infected once with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (dilution stage of 10(-3)), the organisms were eliminated after only nine days in living G. p. palpalis, but after 14 days in living G. m. morsitans. Females were infected at different stages of pregnancy but the same bacteria were not isolated in any puparia. Therefore, transmission of the bacteria to larvae growing in the uterus could not be demonstrated. All antibiotics used, to which bacteria isolated from tsetse flies in the laboratory were sensitive, caused a reduction in productivity. Parental females as well as females which emerged from larvae deposited by these flies (= F1-generation) 6 days after the administration of the drug to the pregnant females showed a similar loss in productivity. This corresponds with a degeneration of mesenteric symbionts. The most successful way to cope with bacterial infection in the membrane feeding technique in the rearing of tsetse flies has proved to be prophylactic measures, i.e. sterile membranes, sterile underlying aluminium trays and sterile blood. The methods employed at this laboratory, where up to 20 000 flies are being fed daily through membranes, have prevented dangerous bacterial infections in both species.
用于饲养采采蝇的膜饲技术(体外饲养)相较于传统的让采采蝇取食宿主动物的方法具有优势。然而,只要血液仍是采采蝇营养的唯一来源,那么在血液采集、储存或喂食过程中就始终存在被对采采蝇致病的细菌污染的风险。由此导致的采采蝇高死亡率危及这种饲养方法的成功。此处所描述的实验表明,冈比亚采采蝇比加蓬采采蝇对铜绿假单胞菌更敏感。多年的饲养实验证实了这一发现,即后者从未受到高细菌诱导死亡率的威胁,而在1973 - 1974年,由于体外喂食血液的污染,一群冈比亚采采蝇难以定殖。摄入的感染血液量(14至70毫克)对存活率没有影响。然而,当采采蝇一旦感染铜绿假单胞菌(稀释度为10⁻³),在存活的加蓬采采蝇中,这些细菌仅在九天后就被清除,但在存活的冈比亚采采蝇中则在十四天后才被清除。雌性采采蝇在怀孕的不同阶段受到感染,但在任何蛹中都未分离出相同的细菌。因此,无法证明细菌会传播给子宫内生长的幼虫。所有对实验室中从采采蝇分离出的细菌敏感的抗生素都会导致生产率下降。亲代雌性以及在给怀孕雌性施用药物六天后由这些采采蝇产下的幼虫羽化出的雌性(= F1代)表现出类似的生产率损失。这与肠系膜共生体的退化相对应。在采采蝇饲养的膜饲技术中,应对细菌感染最成功的方法已证明是采取预防措施,即使用无菌膜、无菌的底层铝盘和无菌血液。本实验室采用的方法,即每天通过膜饲养多达20000只采采蝇,已防止了这两个物种发生危险的细菌感染。