Lawrence D M, Cobb N J, Beard J I
Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Feb;48(1):63-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.48.1.63.
Accuracy rates for auditory and tactile recognition of naturalistic stimuli over a 7-day period are compared. 40 subjects listened to 50, 107, or 194 naturalistic sounds and were tested immediately or after delays of 2 or 7 days. 30 other subjects handled but did not visually inspect 150 common objects and were tested over the same three delay intervals. Recognition accuracy for sounds was 87.5%, 82.5%, and 80.4% while common objects were recognized at 96.0%, 93.8%, and 88.5% rates of accuracy. Tactile recognition memory was superior to auditory recognition memory. The recognition accuracies of both modalities were affected by the delay interval. The number of items inspected had no effect on the recognition memory for sounds. Following a delay of 1 wk., the accuracy of recognition relative to the original level of function was 92% for both modalities.
比较了7天内对自然主义刺激的听觉和触觉识别准确率。40名受试者听了50、107或194种自然主义声音,并在听完后立即进行测试,或在延迟2天或7天后进行测试。另外30名受试者触摸了150个常见物体,但没有进行视觉检查,并在相同的三个延迟间隔内进行了测试。声音的识别准确率分别为87.5%、82.5%和80.4%,而常见物体的识别准确率分别为96.0%、93.8%和88.5%。触觉识别记忆优于听觉识别记忆。两种模式的识别准确率都受到延迟间隔的影响。检查的项目数量对声音的识别记忆没有影响。延迟1周后,两种模式相对于原始功能水平的识别准确率均为92%。