Kawabori I, Stevenson J G, Dooley T K, Phillips D J, Sylvester C M, Guntheroth W G
Am Heart J. 1979 Aug;98(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(79)90216-3.
Forty-four youngsters with precordial murmurs and carotid bruits were evaluated clinically and independently, using pulsed Doppler ultrasound. The precordial murmur was evaluated with M-mode echocardiography combined with Doppler flow evaluation, and the carotid bruit was evaluated with peripheral vascular sector scan with Doppler flow evaluation. These ultrasonic techniques can identify abnormal blood flow at anatomic sites such as the aortic valve and in the carotid arteries. The patients had no symptoms and their condition, except for six, was mild enough that catheterization was not indicated. The clinical diagnosis of aortic stenosis was made in 30 children, and nine were thought to have no heart disease. On the basis of the ultrasonic examinations, 28 patients were diagnosed as having aortic stenosis and seven subjects had no intracardiac turbulence. However, there was disagreement in 14 instances; four of the six clinical "normals" were found to have aortic stenosis by pulsed Doppler echocardiography; six patients diagnosed as having mild aortic stenosis on a clinical basis were found to have no aortic abnormality. The results confirm that aortic stenosis usually presents as a murmur maximal in the aortic area, which is associated with a carotid bruit. Unfortunately, in at least one-fourth of the cases the murmur was not maximal at the aortic area, and a carotid bruit was found in several normal subjects. Since the consequences of over- or under-diagnosis of aortic stenosis are substantial, careful thought should be given to the differential diagnosis, and if possible, pulsed Doppler echocardiography should be utilized for a definitive statement of aortic valve-induced turbulence.
对44名有心前区杂音和颈动脉杂音的青少年进行了临床评估,并独立使用脉冲多普勒超声进行检查。采用M型超声心动图结合多普勒血流评估来评估心前区杂音,采用外周血管扇形扫描结合多普勒血流评估来评估颈动脉杂音。这些超声技术能够识别诸如主动脉瓣和颈动脉等解剖部位的异常血流。患者均无症状,除6人外,病情均较轻,无需进行心导管检查。30名儿童被临床诊断为主动脉狭窄,9人被认为没有心脏病。根据超声检查结果,28例患者被诊断为主动脉狭窄,7例患者未发现心内湍流。然而,有14例存在分歧;6例临床“正常”患者中有4例经脉冲多普勒超声心动图检查发现有主动脉狭窄;6例临床诊断为轻度主动脉狭窄的患者经检查发现无主动脉异常。结果证实,主动脉狭窄通常表现为主动脉区最响亮的杂音,并伴有颈动脉杂音。遗憾的是,至少四分之一的病例中,杂音在主动脉区并非最响亮,而且在一些正常受试者中也发现了颈动脉杂音。由于主动脉狭窄的过度诊断或诊断不足后果严重,因此应慎重考虑鉴别诊断,如有可能,应使用脉冲多普勒超声心动图来明确主动脉瓣引起的湍流情况。