Schoentag R A, Pedersen J T
Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Jun;71(6):685-94. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/71.6.685.
The performance of a diff3 System prototype instrument that does automated leukocyte differential counts, erythrocytic morphology determinations, and leukocyte count and platelet count estimates, was compared with performance by laboratory personnel for a five-week period in an active general hospital. Using experienced supervisors as the referee method, this instrument performed as well as the routine laboratory staff in all aspects of leukocyte differential counting. With respect to erythrocytic morphology, estimates of hypochromia were inferior to those of the routine laboratory staff; comparisons of estimates of macrocytosis and polychromasia were not significantly different. Leukocyte and platelet numerical estimate performance by the diff3 System was not as good as that of automated cell-counting instruments, but categorization of platelet concentration as normal or abnormal did compare favorably with estimation by laboratory personnel. The flagging of abnormal slides by the instrument was comparable in sensitivity to that by the routine laboratory staff; however, specificity was less, with a significantly greater number of false positives obtained by use of the instrument.
在一家综合性医院,对一台具有自动白细胞分类计数、红细胞形态测定以及白细胞计数和血小板计数估算功能的diff3系统原型仪器,与实验室工作人员在五周时间内的表现进行了比较。以经验丰富的主管作为裁判方法,该仪器在白细胞分类计数的各个方面表现与常规实验室工作人员相当。在红细胞形态方面,低色素血症的估算不如常规实验室工作人员;大红细胞症和多染性的估算比较无显著差异。diff3系统的白细胞和血小板数值估算表现不如自动细胞计数仪器,但血小板浓度正常或异常的分类与实验室工作人员的估算相比具有优势。该仪器对异常玻片的标记在敏感性上与常规实验室工作人员相当;然而,特异性较低,使用该仪器获得的假阳性数量显著更多。