• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作环境中有害空气传播物质的允许限值在职业病预防中的作用。

The role of permissible limits for hazardous airborne substances in the working environment in the prevention of occupational disease.

作者信息

Hatch T F

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1972;47(2):151-9.

PMID:4539411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2480895/
Abstract

Recognized limits of permissible exposure to hazardous airborne substances adopted by different countries for industrial health protection may differ by a factor of 10. A Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational Health in 1969 was unable to recommend a single set of values as international standards for more than a few toxic agents. The greatest differences are in the tolerance limits employed in the USA and in the USSR. The reasons for this substantial disagreement are discussed in this paper and are explained in terms of fundamental differences in the psychophysiological criteria employed to establish safe limits between the maintenance of good health and the development of a significant threat to the health. Some practical implications in the selection of permissible limits of exposure by developing countries are discussed in relation to living standards, endemic disease, climate, and geographical situation.

摘要

不同国家为保护工业健康而采用的公认的有害空气传播物质允许接触限值可能相差10倍。1969年国际劳工组织/世界卫生组织职业健康联合委员会无法就超过少数几种有毒物质的单一套数值作为国际标准提出建议。最大的差异存在于美国和苏联采用的耐受限值中。本文讨论了这种重大分歧的原因,并从用于确定健康维护与对健康构成重大威胁之间安全限值的心理生理标准的根本差异方面进行了解释。还结合生活水平、地方病、气候和地理情况讨论了发展中国家在选择接触允许限值方面的一些实际影响。

相似文献

1
The role of permissible limits for hazardous airborne substances in the working environment in the prevention of occupational disease.工作环境中有害空气传播物质的允许限值在职业病预防中的作用。
Bull World Health Organ. 1972;47(2):151-9.
2
Permissible levels of occupational exposure to airborne toxic substances.空气中有毒物质的职业接触容许水平。
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1969;415:5-16.
3
[Current status of the problem of permissible or tolerable limits for potentially toxic chemical agents in occupational environments].[职业环境中潜在有毒化学物质的允许或耐受限度问题的现状]
Arch Mal Prof. 1971 Apr-May;32(4):353-70.
4
Criteria and standards for occupational exposures to airborne chemicals.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987 Jul;4(3):619-28.
5
Methods used in establishing permissible levels in occupational exposure to harmful agents. Report of a WHO expert Committee with the participation of ILO.
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1977(601):1-68.
6
Criteria for a recommended standard--occupational exposure to inorganic mercury.
J Occup Med. 1973 Nov;15(11):909-13.
7
Airborne toxic substances.空气传播的有毒物质。
WHO Chron. 1970 Feb;24(2):72-3.
8
Trends of development of hygienic norm-setting for harmful substances.有害物质卫生标准制定的发展趋势
J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1980;24(3):324-31.
9
[Maximum permissible concentration of toxic substances in biological materials].[生物材料中有毒物质的最大允许浓度]
Nar Zdrav. 1971 Sep;27(9):329-32.
10
[Occupational exposure to hazardous agents in enterprises supervised by the State Sanitary Inspection].[国家卫生监督所监管企业中职业性接触有害因素的情况]
Med Pr. 2003;54(3):215-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Sufficient challenge.足够的挑战。
Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1967 Feb;5(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-6264(67)82886-4.