• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然父亲家庭系统与继父家庭系统的实证比较。

An empirical comparison of natural-father and stepfather family systems.

作者信息

Perkins T F, Kahan J P

出版信息

Fam Process. 1979 Jun;18(2):175-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00175.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00175.x
PMID:456500
Abstract

This study examined the family system differences between 40 volunteer natural-father and stepfather families. Family triads consisting of the husband, the wife, and a child whose age ranged from 12 to 15 years were studied. Four instruments were used: (a) the Family Concept Q-Sort; (b) a Semantic Differential; (c) a demographic questionnaire; and (d) an interaction-reaction questionnaire. Analyses of variance on the data obtained from the Q-sorts and the Semantic Differentials indicated that stepfather family systems are different from natural-father family systems along several salient dimensions including psychological adjustment, satisfaction with family, reciprocal understanding, and perceived goodness and potency. It was concluded that the differences between the family systems in terms of their interpersonal relations and perceptions affect the entire stepparent family system and its ability to function adequately.

摘要

本研究调查了40个志愿参与的亲生父亲家庭和继父家庭之间的家庭系统差异。研究对象为丈夫、妻子以及一名年龄在12至15岁之间孩子组成的三人家庭。使用了四种工具:(a)家庭概念Q分类法;(b)语义差异量表;(c)人口统计学问卷;(d)互动反应问卷。对从Q分类法和语义差异量表获得的数据进行方差分析表明,继父家庭系统在几个显著维度上与亲生父亲家庭系统不同,包括心理调适、对家庭的满意度、相互理解以及感知到的善良和效能感。研究得出结论,家庭系统在人际关系和认知方面的差异会影响整个继父母家庭系统及其充分发挥功能的能力。

相似文献

1
An empirical comparison of natural-father and stepfather family systems.自然父亲家庭系统与继父家庭系统的实证比较。
Fam Process. 1979 Jun;18(2):175-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00175.x.
2
Structural complexity and the quality of stepfather-stepchild relationships.结构复杂性与继父子关系的质量。
Fam Process. 1984 Dec;23(4):547-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00547.x.
3
An empirical investigation of interaction and relationship patterns in functional and dysfunctional nuclear families and stepfamilies.对功能正常和功能失调的核心家庭及再婚家庭中的互动与关系模式的实证研究。
Fam Process. 1986 Sep;25(3):407-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00407.x.
4
Stepfamily functioning and closeness: children's views on second marriages and stepfather relationships.继亲家庭的功能和亲密关系:儿童对二婚和继父关系的看法。
Soc Work. 2013 Apr;58(2):127-36. doi: 10.1093/sw/swt007.
5
Halos vs. stigmas: long-term effects of parent's death or divorce on college students' concepts of the family.光环与污名:父母死亡或离异对大学生家庭观念的长期影响
Adolescence. 1983 Winter;18(72):947-55.
6
The family environment of sexual abuse: a comparison of natal and stepfather abuse.
Child Abuse Negl. 1989;13(1):121-30. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(89)90035-5.
7
A Typology of Interactional Patterns Between Youth and Their Stepfathers: Associations with Family Relationship Quality and Youth Well-Being.青少年与继父互动模式的类型学:与家庭关系质量和青少年幸福感的关联。
Fam Process. 2019 Jun;58(2):384-403. doi: 10.1111/famp.12348. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
8
Predicting marital separation: do parent-child relationships matter?预测婚姻破裂:亲子关系重要吗?
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Aug;26(4):499-508. doi: 10.1037/a0028863. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
9
Factors that contribute to satisfaction or dissatisfaction in stepfather-stepchild relationships.影响继父与继子关系满意度的因素。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 1998 Apr-Jun;34(2):25-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.1998.tb01224.x.
10
Act No. 89-01 of 17 January 1989 amending the Family Code.1989年1月17日第89 - 01号法案,修订《家庭法典》。
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1989;16:59.

引用本文的文献

1
A reply to Gelles: Stepchildrenare disproportionately abused, and diverse forms of violencecan share causal factors.对盖勒斯的回应:继子女遭受虐待的比例过高,而且多种形式的暴力可能有共同的成因。
Hum Nat. 1991 Dec;2(4):419-26. doi: 10.1007/BF02692199.