Ulrich G, Harms K
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1979 May;59(5):481-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1979.tb00247.x.
Video-taped interviews of 47, predominantly endogenous depressive in-patients, recorded on days 0 and 21 of pharmacotherapy were analysed with respect to frequency, duration and side-preference of defined hand movements. The data were related to clinical improvement or deterioration as assessed by judgement of the syndromal aspects: retardation and agitation. 1. Above all, improvement is marked by a decrease of Continuous body-focused movements (C) and an increase of Object-focused movements (O) of the speech primacy type (OS)-deterioration by an increase of C and decrease of OS. 2. The degree of retardation corresponds to O, the degree of agitation, above all to C. 3. O show no side-preference with a higher degree of retardation or agitation respectively, but a marked right perference with a lower degree of retardation or agitation, Discrete body touching (D) shows a left preference only, with a higher degree of retardation. A comparison of sidedness of O between interviews 1 and 2 shows no lateralization trend, either in the improvement or the deterioration group. In contrast, D changed from left weightiness to symmetry, coinciding with improvement but not with deterioration, With reference to the latter findings we discuss the possibility of a particular mode of cerebral lateralization predisposing to endogenous depression.
对47名主要为内源性抑郁住院患者在药物治疗第0天和第21天进行的录像访谈,分析了特定手部动作的频率、持续时间和偏好侧。数据与根据综合征方面(迟缓与激越)判断评估的临床改善或恶化情况相关。1. 最重要的是,改善的标志是持续性身体聚焦动作(C)减少,言语主导型物体聚焦动作(OS)增加;恶化则表现为C增加和OS减少。2. 迟缓程度与OS相对应,激越程度主要与C相对应。3. OS在分别具有较高迟缓或激越程度时无偏好侧,但在较低迟缓或激越程度时有明显的右侧偏好,离散性身体触摸(D)仅在较高迟缓程度时有左侧偏好。访谈1和访谈2之间OS偏好侧的比较显示,改善组或恶化组均无偏侧化趋势。相比之下,D从左侧优势变为对称,与改善相符但与恶化不符。参照后一项发现,我们讨论了一种特定的大脑偏侧化模式易导致内源性抑郁的可能性。