Vinazzer H
Anaesthesist. 1979 Jun;28(6):299-303.
Four different heparin assay methods were compared. Only procedures which can be routinely carried out in clinical laboratories were taken into consideration. A range of heparin concentrations was chosen for these tests which is likely to be expected in low dose heparin prophylaxis. The lowest sensitivity was found when the thrombin clotting time was applied, and slightly better results were obtained by the aPTT method. Addition of purified antithrombin III to the reaction mixtures improved the sensitivity of both methods. When factor Xa was used in a clotting test, the results were comparable to the aPTT method. The sensitivity was however, about 10 times higher when the remaining factor Xa was directly measured in a photometric assay system with a chromogenic substrate. The advantages and disadvantages of the different methods and the usefulness of heparin assays for clinical purposes are discussed.
对四种不同的肝素检测方法进行了比较。仅考虑可在临床实验室常规开展的程序。为这些测试选择了一系列肝素浓度,这些浓度在低剂量肝素预防中可能会出现。应用凝血酶凝血时间时灵敏度最低,活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)法的结果稍好一些。向反应混合物中添加纯化的抗凝血酶III可提高两种方法的灵敏度。在凝血试验中使用因子Xa时,结果与aPTT法相当。然而,当在具有显色底物的光度分析系统中直接测量剩余的因子Xa时,灵敏度约高10倍。讨论了不同方法的优缺点以及肝素检测在临床应用中的实用性。