Willems J L, Denef B, Kesteloot H, De Geest H
Br Heart J. 1979 Jun;41(6):716-26. doi: 10.1136/hrt.41.6.716.
A comparison was made in 7 dogs of the results obtained by 6 different apex cardiographic transducers applied before, during, and after controlled infusion of angiotensin and isoprenaline. The electrocardiogram, internal phonocardiogram, aortic and left ventricular pressure using a Telco micromanometer, and apex cardiogram were recorded simultaneously on magnetic tape and paper. Digital computer techniques were used to derive various measurements. The comparison of the 6 transducer systems was made expecially with respect to measurements derived from the normalised derivative, calculated using total as well as developed pressure or displacement. Measurements derived from left ventricular pressure were very reproducible. Differences in results of 'contractility' indices varied between 0.5 and 1.9 per cent. Indices from the apex cardiogram using 6 different transducer systems showed variations up to 20 per cent, with mean values varying between 3.2 and 8.1 per cent. There was a systematic deviation for one transducer system, which was responsible for a significant part of the observed variability. It may be concluded that in order to assure maximal reproducibility, technical characteristics of the apex cardiograph transducer should be taken into account and an optimal recording technique should be used.
对7只狗进行了比较,观察了在控制性输注血管紧张素和异丙肾上腺素之前、期间及之后,使用6种不同的心尖心动图换能器所获得的结果。使用Telco微压计同步记录心电图、心内心音图、主动脉和左心室压力以及心尖心动图,并记录在磁带和纸上。运用数字计算机技术得出各种测量值。对这6种换能器系统的比较,尤其针对从归一化导数得出的测量值,该导数使用总压力以及发展压力或位移进行计算。从左心室压力得出的测量值具有很高的可重复性。“收缩性”指数结果的差异在0.5%至1.9%之间。使用6种不同换能器系统的心尖心动图指数显示变化高达20%,平均值在3.2%至8.1%之间。有一种换能器系统存在系统性偏差,这是观察到的变异性的一个重要部分。可以得出结论,为确保最大程度的可重复性,应考虑心尖心动图换能器的技术特性,并采用最佳记录技术。