Hansen J L, Freier E F
Am J Med Technol. 1975 Mar;41(3):106-13.
We compared two methods for serum thyroxine measurement by competitive protein binding - the Murphy and Pattee and the Seligson and Seligson methods. We found the Seligson and Seligson method, which requires less sample volume and analysis time, to be the method of choice on the basis of sensitivity, extraction efficiency, precision, and accuracy. Standard plots of time/10,000 counts versus thyroxine concentration are linear to 20 ug/dl, extraction efficiency is 99.6 per cent, within-day S.D. plus or minus 0.28 ug/dl, and 98.3 per cent of added thyroxine is recovered in the Seligson and Seligson method. The Seligson and Seligson method is superior to the Murphy and Pattee method with respect to all these parameters. The methods were also compared with correlation and normal value studies.
我们比较了两种通过竞争性蛋白结合法测定血清甲状腺素的方法——墨菲和帕蒂法以及塞利格森和塞利格森法。我们发现,基于灵敏度、提取效率、精密度和准确度,塞利格森和塞利格森法所需样本量更少且分析时间更短,是首选方法。时间/10,000计数与甲状腺素浓度的标准曲线在20微克/分升范围内呈线性,提取效率为99.6%,日内标准差为±0.28微克/分升,在塞利格森和塞利格森法中,添加的甲状腺素回收率为98.3%。在所有这些参数方面,塞利格森和塞利格森法均优于墨菲和帕蒂法。还通过相关性研究和正常值研究对这两种方法进行了比较。