Genant H K, Doi K, Mall J C
Invest Radiol. 1975 Mar-Apr;10(2):160-72. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197503000-00010.
Fine-detail radiographic techniques for peripheral skeletal imaging have gained wide clinical acceptance. In this study, the imaging properties and clinical applications of the optical magnification technique, which employs fine-grain industrial film and a large focal spot, are compared quantitatively and qualitatively with those of three slow screen-film techniques, namely, contact exposure with a large focal spot, 2 times radiographic magnification with a 0.3 mm focal spot, and 4 times radiographic magnification with a 50 mu focal spot. The modulation transfer functions (MTF's) of the recording systems and focal spots are obtained and film sensitometry performed. Clinical comparisons are made for patients with metabolic, arthritic, and neoplastic skeletal disorders. The results illustrate the superiority of the optical magnification technique over contact or 2 times magnification techniques using slow screen-film systems. If a microfocus tube is used, however, direct radiographic magnification may provide images comparable in resolution, noise and contrast to those made with the optical magnification technique, and at lower radiation exposure to the patient.
用于外周骨骼成像的高细节放射照相技术已在临床上得到广泛认可。在本研究中,将采用细颗粒工业胶片和大焦点的光学放大技术的成像特性及临床应用,与三种慢速增感屏 - 胶片技术,即大焦点接触曝光、0.3毫米焦点的2倍放射照相放大以及50微米焦点的4倍放射照相放大,进行了定量和定性比较。获得了记录系统和焦点的调制传递函数(MTF)并进行了胶片感光测定。对患有代谢性、关节炎性和肿瘤性骨骼疾病的患者进行了临床比较。结果表明,光学放大技术优于使用慢速增感屏 - 胶片系统的接触或2倍放大技术。然而,如果使用微焦点管,直接放射照相放大可能提供在分辨率、噪声和对比度方面与光学放大技术相当的图像,并且对患者的辐射暴露更低。