Suppr超能文献

一种用于治疗转移性乳腺癌的多学科方法。

A multidisciplined approach for the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the breast.

作者信息

Oberfield R A, Nesto R, Cady B, Pazianos A G, Salzman F A

出版信息

Med Clin North Am. 1975 Mar;59(2):425-30. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)32043-0.

Abstract

We have reviewed our experience in a multidisciplined breast cancer clinic where we have utilized hormonal, ablative, and chemotherapetuci modalities. Our experience seesm to be similar to that of other groups in that oophorectomy treatment produces approximately a 61 per cent response (regression and arrest) rate, androgen therapy produces a 47 per cent response (regression and arrest) rate estrogen therapy produces a 40 per cent response (regression and arrest) rate, and ablative treatment produces approximately a 50 per cent response (regression and arrest) rate. Adrenalectomy and hypophysectomy showed similar response rates. Until it can be shown that hypophysectomy clearly offers enhanced benefits, this will not be utilized by our group except in those patients who cannot tolerate abdominal surgery (that is, patients with poor pulmonary reserve). Of interest is the high response rate (65 per cent) to ablative treatment in patients in whom disease exacerbates on additive hormonal treatment, with an increased duration of response and survival. Survival is increased in patients who are rebound responders after estrogen withdrawal. We expect to report data with future follow-up of this group of patients. New protocols will be instituted after review of the data in the hope of increasing clinical benefit and survival in this group of patients. Carcinoma of the breast accounts for almost 90,000 new cases of cancer a year, with metastases eventually developing in at least half of these patients. All physicians must be aware of the many complex problems associated with this disease and, hopefully, arrive at a logical approach for its control. We believe this can be achieved with a multidisciplined group approach as established at the Lahey Clinic Foundation.

摘要

我们回顾了在一家多学科乳腺癌诊所的经验,在那里我们采用了激素、消融和化疗等治疗方式。我们的经验似乎与其他团队相似,即卵巢切除术的治疗有效率约为61%(消退和停滞),雄激素治疗的有效率为47%(消退和停滞),雌激素治疗的有效率为40%(消退和停滞),消融治疗的有效率约为50%(消退和停滞)。肾上腺切除术和垂体切除术显示出相似的有效率。在能够证明垂体切除术明显能带来更大益处之前,我们团队不会采用这种方法,除非是那些无法耐受腹部手术的患者(即肺储备功能差的患者)。有趣的是,在接受激素添加治疗后病情加重的患者中,消融治疗的有效率较高(65%),且缓解期和生存期延长。雌激素撤药后出现反应性反弹的患者生存期延长。我们期望在对这组患者进行进一步随访后报告相关数据。在审查数据后将制定新的方案,以期提高这组患者的临床获益和生存率。乳腺癌每年新增病例近9万例,其中至少一半患者最终会发生转移。所有医生都必须意识到与这种疾病相关的许多复杂问题,并希望能找到一种合理的控制方法。我们相信,像拉希诊所基金会所采用的多学科团队方法能够实现这一目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验