• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床能力考核中多项选择题测试与自由应答测试的比较。

A comparison of multiple-choice tests and free-response tests in examinations of clinical competence.

作者信息

Newble D I, Baxter A, Elmslie R G

出版信息

Med Educ. 1979 Jul;13(4):263-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1979.tb01511.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1979.tb01511.x
PMID:470647
Abstract

This paper reports a study which compared the performance of different groups of students and doctors on identical and equivalent tests set in an objective-type format and in a free-response format. The tests were designed to ensure that the content was relevant to clinical practice at the hospital intern level. In all test situations candidates' scores were significantly higher in the objective tests than in the free-response tests. This difference was greater for the more junior and less competent students than for the more competent doctors. The cueing effect of the options was thought to be the main factor responsible for the difference in performance. The results of a questionnaire survey demonstrated that students were aware of the deficiencies in multiple-choice tests. A large majority of the students believed that the free-response tests gave a more accurate assessment of their clinical ability. It was found that in these tests, aimed at measuring aspects of clinical competence, multiple-choice questions appeared to overestimate the candidate's ability to an extent that made them less suitable than free-response questions for this purpose. It was also found that free-response tests, of the type used in this study, provide a suitable alternative to multiple-choice tests for use in the written section of clinical examinations. It was concluded that the written component of the final examination in the medical course should have a preponderance of free-response items over multiple-choice items.

摘要

本文报道了一项研究,该研究比较了不同组别的学生和医生在以客观题型和自由回答题型设置的相同及等效测试中的表现。这些测试旨在确保其内容与医院实习医生水平的临床实践相关。在所有测试情况下,客观测试中考生的分数显著高于自由回答测试。对于资历较浅、能力较差的学生来说,这种差异比能力较强的医生更大。选项的提示作用被认为是造成表现差异的主要因素。一项问卷调查结果表明,学生们意识到多项选择题测试存在不足之处。绝大多数学生认为自由回答测试能更准确地评估他们的临床能力。研究发现,在这些旨在衡量临床能力各方面的测试中,多项选择题在一定程度上似乎高估了考生的能力,以至于在这方面不如自由回答题合适。研究还发现,本研究中使用的自由回答测试,可作为多项选择题测试的合适替代方式,用于临床考试的笔试部分。研究得出结论,医学课程期末考试的笔试部分应增加自由回答题的比重,减少多项选择题的比重。

相似文献

1
A comparison of multiple-choice tests and free-response tests in examinations of clinical competence.临床能力考核中多项选择题测试与自由应答测试的比较。
Med Educ. 1979 Jul;13(4):263-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1979.tb01511.x.
2
The impact of cueing on written examinations of clinical decision making: a case study.提示对临床决策书面考试的影响:一项案例研究。
Med Educ. 2014 Mar;48(3):255-61. doi: 10.1111/medu.12296.
3
Illustrated multiple choice examinations.配有插图的多项选择题考试。
Med Educ. 1978 Nov;12(6):417-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1978.tb01420.x.
4
Patient management problems. Issues of validity.患者管理问题。有效性问题。
Med Educ. 1982 May;16(3):137-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01073.x.
5
Quantifying learning in medical students during a critical care medicine elective: a comparison of three evaluation instruments.在重症医学选修课期间对医学生的学习进行量化:三种评估工具的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;29(6):1268-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200106000-00039.
6
Are multiple choice tests fair to medical students with specific learning disabilities?多选题考试对有特定学习障碍的医学生公平吗?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 May;15(2):265-75. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9197-8. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
7
Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?论文及其他“开放式”问题在临床医学书面总结性评估中是否应保留一席之地?
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 28;14:249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0249-2.
8
The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.为学习而进行测试对后期表现的益处。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015 May;20(2):305-20. doi: 10.1007/s10459-014-9529-1. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
9
Relationship between candidate communication ability and oral certification examination scores.应试者沟通能力与口腔认证考试成绩之间的关系。
Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03231.x.
10
Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.计算机化医学评估中长菜单式问题与开放式问题的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Oct 10;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Online Peer-Assisted Learning and Faculty-Led Teaching for Short Answer Questions.在线同伴辅助学习与教师主导教学在简答题方面的比较
Clin Teach. 2025 Jun;22(3):e70069. doi: 10.1111/tct.70069.
2
Comparison of mistakes on multiple-choice question and fill-in-the-blank examinations: A retrospective analysis.选择题考试与填空题考试错误情况的比较:一项回顾性分析。
J Chiropr Educ. 2024 Oct 23;38(2):100-105. doi: 10.7899/JCE-23-8.
3
A successful intervention to improve conceptual knowledge of medical students who rely on memorization of disclosed items.
一项成功的干预措施,用于提高依赖记忆已公开项目的医学生的概念知识。
Front Physiol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1258149. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1258149. eCollection 2023.
4
An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.对医学生高风险测试中的多项选择题和简答题进行的实验比较。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;29(3):783-801. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10266-3. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
5
Use of very short answer questions compared to multiple choice questions in undergraduate medical students: An external validation study.采用简答题而非选择题对医学生进行测试:一项外部验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 14;18(7):e0288558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288558. eCollection 2023.
6
Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.单项选择题评分:不同评分方法的范围审查与比较
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 May 19;9:e44084. doi: 10.2196/44084.
7
Barriers and facilitators to writing quality items for medical school assessments - a scoping review.编写医学院评估质量项目的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 2;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1544-8.
8
ORGANIZATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE ANESTHESIOLOGY ORAL PRACTICE EXAMINATION PROGRAM: Planning, Structure, Startup, Administration, Growth and Evaluation.综合麻醉学口腔实践考试项目的组织:规划、结构、启动、管理、发展与评估。
J Educ Perioper Med. 1999 May 1;1(2):E007. eCollection 1999 May-Aug.
9
Impact of different scoring algorithms applied to multiple-mark survey items on outcome assessment: an in-field study on health-related knowledge.应用于多标记调查项目的不同评分算法对结果评估的影响:一项关于健康相关知识的实地研究
J Prev Med Hyg. 2015;56(4):E162-71.
10
Does the Concept of the "Flipped Classroom" Extend to the Emergency Medicine Clinical Clerkship?“翻转课堂”的概念是否适用于急诊医学临床实习?
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):851-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27256. Epub 2015 Oct 22.