Campbell D G
Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Aug;88(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90466-5.
We evaluated four diagnostic techniques for angle-closure glaucoma (Koeppe gonioscopy, Goldmann three-mirror gonioscopy, compressive Zeiss four-mirror gonioscopy, and the operative chamber deepening procedure) to ascertain their relative effectiveness in determining: (1) whether the angle was open or closed, and (2) whether the closure was appositional or synechial and permanent. Koeppe gonioscopy was the most reliable way to determine whether the angle was open or closed, because this lens caused no artifactual widening of the peripheral angle and allowed the best view over an often convex iris. Zeiss four-mirror compressive gonioscopy or the operative chamber deepening procedure were equally reliable ways to determine whether the closure was appositional or synechial and permanent. A comparison between compressive Zeiss four-mirror gonioscopy and the operative chamber deepening procedure revealed that the latter has therapeutic value as well as diagnostic value, that is, it can separate recently formed adhesions.
我们评估了四种用于闭角型青光眼的诊断技术(科佩前房角镜检查、戈德曼三面镜前房角镜检查、蔡司四面镜压迫式前房角镜检查以及手术性前房加深术),以确定它们在判断以下情况时的相对有效性:(1)房角是开放还是关闭;(2)房角关闭是贴附性的还是粘连性且永久性的。科佩前房角镜检查是判断房角开放或关闭的最可靠方法,因为这种透镜不会导致周边房角人为增宽,并且能在通常呈凸面的虹膜上提供最佳视野。蔡司四面镜压迫式前房角镜检查或手术性前房加深术是判断房角关闭是贴附性的还是粘连性且永久性的同样可靠的方法。对蔡司四面镜压迫式前房角镜检查和手术性前房加深术的比较显示,后者不仅具有诊断价值,还具有治疗价值,即它可以分离近期形成的粘连。