Donnelly E F, Murphy D L, Waldman I N, Buchsbaum M S, Coursey R D
Biol Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;14(2):375-83.
From an original sample of 375 college students and employees studied for platelet MAO activity, 66 subjects representing the lower and upper deciles of the sample were contacted for further study, including administration of the booklet form of the MMPI. We analyzed what psychological characteristics might be associated with differences in MAO activity and attempted to cross-validate these characteristics by using them to predict the separability of low vs. high MAO subjects. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of two groups in which the low and high MAO subjects were balanced for sex. For 16 women in group A, a MAO scale discriminated low and high subjects with 100% accuracy. For 18 men in group A, a separate MAO scale discriminated with 94% accuracy. To cross-validate these results, the two scales were applied to another population; both discriminated low and high MAO women and men with a combined 97% accuracy. The thematic content of the two scales is discussed in the light of other reports on the psychological characteristics of low and high MAO subjects, including the apparent relationship between the scale content and the clinical features of bipolar affective disorder.
从最初研究血小板单胺氧化酶(MAO)活性的375名大学生和员工样本中,选取了代表样本上下十分位数的66名受试者进行进一步研究,包括发放明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)手册版。我们分析了哪些心理特征可能与MAO活性差异相关,并试图通过用这些特征预测低MAO与高MAO受试者的可分离性来交叉验证这些特征。每个受试者被随机分配到两组中的一组,低MAO和高MAO受试者在性别上保持平衡。对于A组的16名女性,一个MAO量表区分低MAO和高MAO受试者的准确率为100%。对于A组的18名男性,一个单独的MAO量表区分的准确率为94%。为了交叉验证这些结果,将这两个量表应用于另一人群;两者区分低MAO和高MAO女性及男性的综合准确率为97%。结合其他关于低MAO和高MAO受试者心理特征的报告,包括量表内容与双相情感障碍临床特征之间的明显关系,对这两个量表的主题内容进行了讨论。