Goldblatt D, Bustin M
Biochemistry. 1975 Apr 22;14(8):1689-95. doi: 10.1021/bi00679a022.
The exposure of antigenic determinants of histones present in "native" chromatin was studied by: (1) testing their ability to elicit anti-histone antibodies and (2) measuring their ability to interact with anti-histone sera. To this end, antisera specific to purified histone fractions and to purified rat liver chromatin were elicited in rabbits. The anti-chromatin sera did not react with pure histone fractions and pure histone fractions F2b, F3, F2a1, and F2a2 failed to inhibit the complement fixation resulting from the binding of anti-chromatin to chromatin. These results suggest that in native chromatin, determinants in these histones are not immunogenic. Histone F1, however, inhibited the reaction between chromatin and anti-chromatin. Antisera elicited by histone fractions reacted weakly with "native" chromatin. The maximal complement fixations (obtained with 5-10 mug of chromatin DNA) were as follows: 60% with anti-F2b, 20% with anti-F1 and anti-F3, and less than 5% with either anti-F2a1 or anti-F2a2. Studies of the interaction between anti-histone antibodies and chromatin in which chromatin was used as an immunoadsorbent indicated that antibodies against different histones were adsorbed to a different degree by the same amount of chromatin. Differences in the immunoadsorbing capacity between sonicated and nonsonicated chromatin were found. Quantitative adsorbtion studies revealed that in the "native" chromatin structure, antigenic determinants of F1 and F2b were more available to interact with homologous antibody than those of F3 and F2a1 and that determinants in F2a2 were the least available. It could be calculated that the "equivalent antigenicity" of the histones in chromatin was 9.6% for F1, 3.2% for F2b, and 0.90% for F3 and F2a1. Upon sonication these values did not change for F1 but increased two-, three-, and fourfold for F2b, F3, and F2a1, respectively. Digestion of chromatin with trypsin totally abolished the ability of chromatin to adsorb anti-histone antibodies.
通过以下方式研究了“天然”染色质中组蛋白抗原决定簇的暴露情况:(1)测试它们引发抗组蛋白抗体的能力,(2)测量它们与抗组蛋白血清相互作用的能力。为此,在兔中制备了针对纯化的组蛋白组分和纯化的大鼠肝染色质的抗血清。抗染色质血清不与纯组蛋白组分反应,并且纯组蛋白组分F2b、F3、F2a1和F2a2不能抑制抗染色质与染色质结合所导致的补体固定。这些结果表明,在天然染色质中,这些组蛋白中的决定簇没有免疫原性。然而,组蛋白F1抑制了染色质与抗染色质之间的反应。由组蛋白组分引发的抗血清与“天然”染色质反应较弱。(用5 - 10微克染色质DNA获得的)最大补体固定率如下:抗F2b为60%,抗F1和抗F3为20%,抗F2a1或抗F2a2均小于5%。使用染色质作为免疫吸附剂研究抗组蛋白抗体与染色质之间相互作用的结果表明,相同量的染色质对不同组蛋白抗体的吸附程度不同。发现超声处理的染色质和未超声处理的染色质在免疫吸附能力上存在差异。定量吸附研究表明,在“天然”染色质结构中,F1和F2b的抗原决定簇比F3和F2a1的抗原决定簇更易于与同源抗体相互作用,而F2a2中的决定簇最不易于相互作用。可以计算出,染色质中组蛋白的“等效抗原性”对于F1为9.6%,对于F2b为3.2%,对于F3和F2a1为0.90%。超声处理后,F1的值不变,但F2b、F3和F2a1的值分别增加了两倍、三倍和四倍。用胰蛋白酶消化染色质完全消除了染色质吸附抗组蛋白抗体的能力。