Suppr超能文献

食品中维生素C的自动荧光测定法。

Automated fluorometric determination of vitamin C in foods.

作者信息

Dunmire D L, Reese J D, Bryan R, Seegers M

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1979 May;62(3):648-52.

PMID:479093
Abstract

Two automated fluorometric methods were compared with the official AOAC methods for determining vitamin C in fortified ready-to-eat cereals, fruits, vegetables, baby foods, flour products, pet foods, meats, frozen dinners, juices, and nutritional health bars. Each sample was analyzed in duplicate on 2 days and included a recovery study on all products. Egberg's semiautomated method (Method 1) and Roy's automated method (Method 2) were compared with the manual AOAC tritrimetric and fluorometric methods. The correlation factor for Methods 1 and 2 were 0.999 and 0.979, respectively, when compared with the AOAC methods. The recovery study showed average recoveries of 97.8% for Method 1, 99.3% for Method 2, and 100.6% for the AOAC methods. The results suggest that Method 1 is the method of choice for the majority of the products analyzed.

摘要

将两种自动荧光法与美国官方分析化学家协会(AOAC)的方法进行了比较,以测定强化即食谷物、水果、蔬菜、婴儿食品、面粉制品、宠物食品、肉类、冷冻餐、果汁和营养健康棒中的维生素C。每个样品在两天内进行了双份分析,并对所有产品进行了回收率研究。将埃格伯格的半自动方法(方法1)和罗伊的自动方法(方法2)与AOAC的手动滴定法和荧光法进行了比较。与AOAC方法相比,方法1和方法2的相关系数分别为0.999和0.979。回收率研究表明,方法1的平均回收率为97.8%,方法2为99.3%,AOAC方法为100.6%。结果表明,方法1是大多数分析产品的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验