• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境线索在儿童确定奇异性规则迁移中的作用。

Role of contextual cues in determining transfer of oddity rule in children.

作者信息

Maruno S

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Jun;48(3 Pt 1):775-81. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.48.3.775.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1979.48.3.775
PMID:482028
Abstract

60 kindergarten and 60 first grade children were trained on an oddity problem with perceptual (P) or conceptual (C) attribute for a fixed number of trials (30). After mastering the training problem, the subjects were randomly assigned to either an intradimensional (CC or PP group) or an extradimensional (CP or PC group) oddity shift. The transfer performance showed CC greater than PC greater than PP = CP group. These differences were attributed to the pattern hypotheses sampled at the start of transfer. Subjects who had acquired a conceptual oddity rule in the training had a strong tendency to sample hypotheses by the prior rule, but subjects under conditions where a perceptual-oddity rule was relevant tended to make a shift to a cue from new (conceptual oddity) rule. The older children yielded more of such a sampling mode than the younger children did, and the former were easily able to abandon a disconfirmed rule and sample hypotheses from the relevant rule domain.

摘要

60名幼儿园儿童和60名一年级儿童接受了关于具有感知(P)或概念(C)属性的奇异性问题的训练,训练次数固定为30次。在掌握了训练问题后,受试者被随机分配到维度内(CC或PP组)或维度间(CP或PC组)奇异性转换任务中。迁移表现显示CC组大于PC组大于PP组 = CP组。这些差异归因于迁移开始时所采用的模式假设。在训练中获得概念性奇异性规则的受试者强烈倾向于按照先前的规则来采用假设,但在感知奇异性规则相关的条件下,受试者倾向于转向新的(概念性奇异性)规则的线索。年龄较大的儿童比年龄较小的儿童产生更多这样的采样模式,并且前者能够轻易地放弃已被否定的规则,并从相关规则领域中采用假设。

相似文献

1
Role of contextual cues in determining transfer of oddity rule in children.情境线索在儿童确定奇异性规则迁移中的作用。
Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Jun;48(3 Pt 1):775-81. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.48.3.775.
2
Tactual learning and cross-modal transfer of an oddity problem in young children.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1989 Feb;47(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(89)90064-7.
3
Oddity learning in developmentally delayed children: facilitation by means of familiar stimuli.发育迟缓儿童的异常学习:通过熟悉刺激实现促进作用。
Am J Ment Retard. 1988 Sep;93(2):138-43.
4
Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.学习规则描述和非规则描述的类别:儿童与成人的比较。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1518-33. doi: 10.1037/a0013355.
5
Children's performance on "animal tests" of oddity: implications for cognitive processes required for tests of oddity and delayed nonmatch to sample.儿童在异常性“动物测试”中的表现:对异常性测试和延迟样本不匹配测试所需认知过程的启示
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Jul;62(2):223-42. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0029.
6
Transfer between the oddity and relative size concepts: reversal and extradimensional shifts.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1972 Apr;13(2):350-67. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(72)90096-3.
7
Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.匹配与奇异性中的学习过程:奇异性偏好效应与样本强化。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):425-32. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425.
8
Group differences and individual classification accuracy associated with letter/word oddity problems.与字母/单词奇异问题相关的组间差异和个体分类准确性。
Am J Ment Retard. 1991 Jan;95(4):404-16.
9
Attentional functioning and relational learning.
Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Nov;95(3):304-15.
10
A limitation on the law of effect.
Am J Ment Defic. 1979 Sep;84(2):132-6.