Vintergal'ter S F, Chernik A V, Dozortsev V F
Vopr Onkol. 1979;25(8):21-9.
A comparison of the results of non-aimed large-frame fluorography (LFF) and roentgen study of the stomach in 301 patients enabled ascertaining more precisely the opportunities of LFF in diagnosing gastric cancer. It was found by checking (fibrogastroscopy with biopsy or surger) that irrespective of the technic of non-aimed LFF, despite the diagnosis being known previously, cancer of the stomach still far from being in early stage may be recognized only in 62-63%. Therefore use of non-aimed LFF to diagnose gastric cancer during mass prophylactic examinations seems to be not rational.
对301例患者进行的非靶向大框架荧光透视（LFF）结果与胃部X线检查结果的比较，能够更准确地确定LFF在诊断胃癌方面的机会。通过检查（纤维胃镜检查并活检或手术）发现，无论非靶向LFF的技术如何，尽管先前已得知诊断结果，但仍处于较晚期的胃癌仅能在62% - 63%的病例中被识别出来。因此，在大规模预防性检查中使用非靶向LFF来诊断胃癌似乎并不合理。
