Caruso I A
Z Klin Psychol Psychother. 1979;27(1):30-8.
Argumentations pro or contra "medical" or "non-medical" psychoanalysis are rarely free from ideologies. Only in the stage of psychoanalytical self-cognition the question becomes another one. It must be differentiated between the educational background and training of the psychoanalyst. It is just the educational background (academica finally examination in medicine, psychologie, theologie etc.) which produces attitudes, which can form (influence) the training in a wrong way. Such discussions become easily a pseudo-question because of a narrow class-arrogance. The urgency of using psychoanalytical concepts and methods in the social field should help to reconcile contrasts.
支持或反对“医学”或“非医学”精神分析的论证很少能摆脱意识形态的影响。只有在精神分析自我认知阶段,问题才会有所不同。必须区分精神分析师的教育背景和培训情况。正是教育背景(最终在医学、心理学、神学等方面的学术考试)产生了一些态度,这些态度可能会以错误的方式形成(影响)培训。由于狭隘的阶层傲慢,此类讨论很容易变成一个伪问题。在社会领域使用精神分析概念和方法的紧迫性应有助于调和分歧。