Weber T, Obel E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1979;58(3):259-63. doi: 10.3109/00016347909154045.
The literature on the course of pregnancies following conization of the uterine cervix has been studied. It is demonstrated that an evaluation of the possible effect of conization upon subsequent pregnancy should be based upon a comparison of either pregnancies before and after conization or upon a comparison between pregnancies in women with a previous conization and in a control group of women without conization. In both cases the possible influence of conization can be evaluated only if the patient material is described as regards age, parity, number of previous pregnancies, smoking habits, etc., factors which may all influence the course of pregnancy. None of the previous publications have described the patient material sufficiently, and most studies have not tried to set up control groups. Due to these deficiencies we do not find it justified that conization leads to reduced fertility, increased frequency of spontaneous abortion, nor to increased perinatal mortality. An increased prematurity rate may not be rejected, however, but this point has not been adequately evaluated in the previous papers.
关于子宫颈锥形切除术后妊娠过程的文献已被研究。结果表明,评估锥形切除术对后续妊娠的可能影响应基于锥形切除术前和术后妊娠情况的比较,或者基于有过锥形切除术的女性与无锥形切除术的女性对照组的妊娠情况比较。在这两种情况下,只有当患者资料在年龄、胎次、既往妊娠次数、吸烟习惯等方面进行描述时,才能评估锥形切除术的可能影响,因为这些因素都可能影响妊娠过程。以往的出版物均未充分描述患者资料,且大多数研究未尝试设立对照组。由于这些不足,我们认为锥形切除术导致生育力降低、自然流产频率增加以及围产期死亡率增加的说法是不合理的。然而,早产率增加这一点不能被排除,但之前的论文对此点并未进行充分评估。