• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种猕猴(恒河猴和食蟹猴)相同的吉姆萨带型:一项光密度测定研究。

Identical giemsa banding patterns of two macaca species: Macaca mulatta and M. fascicularis. A densitometric study.

作者信息

de Vries G F, de France H F, Schevers J A

出版信息

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1975;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1159/000130316.

DOI:10.1159/000130316
PMID:48448
Abstract

Karyotypes of Macaca mulatta and M. fascicularis (2n equals 42) were compared using the Giemsa banding pattern technique. No differences between the chromosomes of both Macaca species were found with conventional staining methods. In the literature the occurrence of fertile hybrids is used as an argument in favor of conspecificity. The banding patterns were evaluated by comparison of their density distribution curves. Our data indicated no significant differences between the two Macaca species.

摘要

使用吉姆萨带型技术比较了恒河猴和食蟹猴(2n = 42)的核型。用传统染色方法未发现两种猕猴染色体之间存在差异。在文献中,可育杂种的出现被用作支持同种性的一个论据。通过比较它们的密度分布曲线来评估带型。我们的数据表明两种猕猴之间没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Identical giemsa banding patterns of two macaca species: Macaca mulatta and M. fascicularis. A densitometric study.两种猕猴(恒河猴和食蟹猴)相同的吉姆萨带型:一项光密度测定研究。
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1975;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1159/000130316.
2
Comparison of the karyotypes of four Cercopithecoidae: Papio papio, P. anubis, Macaca mulatta, and M. fascicularis.四种猕猴科动物(豚尾狒狒、东非狒狒、恒河猴和食蟹猴)的核型比较。
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1979;23(1-2):77-83. doi: 10.1159/000131305.
3
Lymphocyte cultures of Macaca mulatta and Macaca fascicularis.恒河猴和食蟹猴的淋巴细胞培养物。
Lab Anim Sci. 1975 Feb;25(1):33-8.
4
A comparison of the karyotypes of six species of the genus Macaca and a species of the genus Cercocebus.猕猴属六种物种与白睑猴属一种物种的核型比较。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1986;46(3):164-72. doi: 10.1159/000156249.
5
Banding patterns of the chromosomes of Miopithecus talapoin compared with Macaca mulatta and Cercopithecus aethiops.小眼猴(Miopithecus talapoin)与恒河猴(Macaca mulatta)和埃塞俄比亚长尾猴(Cercopithecus aethiops)染色体带型的比较
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1980;28(1-2):41-6. doi: 10.1159/000131510.
6
Comparative study of the banding patterns of the chromosomes of Cercopithecidae. I. Subfamily Papinae: Macaca fascicularis and Papio sphinx.猕猴科染色体带型的比较研究。I. 狒狒亚科:食蟹猕猴和狮尾狒狒。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1976;26(4):306-9. doi: 10.1159/000155761.
7
[Identification of simian chromosomes by a method of differential staining with Romanovskii--giemsa solution. II. Papio hamadryas].[用罗曼诺夫斯基-吉姆萨溶液鉴别染色法鉴定猿猴染色体。II. 阿拉伯狒狒]
Genetika. 1975;11(2):145-50.
8
[Identification of simian chromosomes by the differential staining method with Romanovskii-Giemza stain. II. Papio hamadryas].[应用Romanovskii-Giemza染色差异染色法鉴定猿猴染色体。II. 阿拉伯狒狒]
Genetika. 1975;11(2):145-50.
9
Comparative cytogenetic studies in Macaca arctoides with other species of Macaca and man.熊猴与其他猕猴属物种及人类的比较细胞遗传学研究。
Acta Anthropogenet. 1982;6(4):195-207.
10
[Monkey chromosome identification by the method of differential staining with Romanovskii--Giemsa solution I. Macaca mulatta].[用罗曼诺夫斯基-吉姆萨溶液鉴别猴染色体的方法 I. 恒河猴]
Genetika. 1975;11(1):115-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of One African and Five Asian Macaque Species Reveals Identical Karyotypes as in Mandrill.对一种非洲猕猴和五种亚洲猕猴的分子细胞遗传学分析显示,其核型与山魈相同。
Curr Genomics. 2018 Apr;19(3):207-215. doi: 10.2174/1389202918666170721115047.
2
Chromosomal evolution of the PKD1 gene family in primates.灵长类动物中PKD1基因家族的染色体进化
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Sep 26;8:263. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-263.
3
New cytogenetic techniques in the study of primate genome evolution.灵长类基因组进化研究中的新细胞遗传学技术。
Hum Genet. 1986 Jan;72(1):98-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00278827.
4
Chromosome phylogenies of man, great apes, and Old World monkeys.人类、大猩猩和旧世界猴的染色体系统发育
Genetica. 1987 Aug 31;73(1-2):37-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00057436.