Pickwell L D
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1979 Feb;56(2):78-81. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197902000-00003.
The prevalence of divergence excess was assessed from the records of 250 consecutive patients attending a binocular-vision clinic. The 67 cases in the sample showing divergence excess were subdivided into the following groups: (1) secondary to operations for esotropia (8 cases); (2) anisometropic amblyopes (14 cases); (3) basic (14 cases); (4) convergence weakness (13 cases); (5) divergence excess (18 cases). Treatment methods placed heavy emphasis on physiological diplopia. Of the 18 in the divergence excess category, 14 began treatment, 10 showed a satisfactory outcome, two achieved some improvement, and two discontinued treatment on their own. Divergence excess seems to respond well to nonsurgical treatment.
通过对一家双眼视觉诊所连续就诊的250例患者的记录进行评估，以确定外展过强的患病率。样本中显示外展过强的67例患者被分为以下几组：（1）继发于内斜视手术（8例）；（2）屈光参差性弱视（14例）；（3）基本型（14例）；（4）集合不足（13例）；（5）外展过强（18例）。治疗方法非常重视生理性复视。在18例外展过强类型的患者中，14例开始治疗，10例效果满意，2例有一定改善，2例自行停止治疗。外展过强似乎对非手术治疗反应良好。
