Bouchard R W, Bouchard J P, Bouchard R, Barbeau A
Can J Neurol Sci. 1979 May;6(2):191-4. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100119626.
Electroencephalographic studies have been done in two groups of hereditary ataxia: a group bearing the classical features of Friedreich's ataxia and a group clinically different described as autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS). The qualitative anomalies observed in the two groups were similar and were comparable with the data reported in the literature. However, the main difference between the two groups is the greater incidence of EEG abnormalities in the ARSACS group, which suggests more involvement of the cortical and subcortical structures. This is reinforced by the lower I.Q. performance in the latter patients. Some comments are made about focal EEG findings, behavior and I.Q. In general, EEG was not considered a valuable instrument for diagnosis since no qualitative electric pattern could be identified. With regard to prognosis, EEG cannot be used as a criterion, since there is no relation between the degree of anomalies and the severity of the disease and since EEG does not worsen with the progression of the disease.
一组具有弗里德赖希共济失调的典型特征,另一组临床上有所不同,被描述为魁北克沙勒沃伊-萨格奈常染色体隐性痉挛性共济失调(ARSACS)。在两组中观察到的定性异常相似,并且与文献中报道的数据相当。然而,两组之间的主要差异在于ARSACS组脑电图异常的发生率更高,这表明皮质和皮质下结构受累更多。后一组患者较低的智商表现进一步证实了这一点。对脑电图局灶性表现、行为和智商进行了一些评论。总体而言,脑电图不被认为是一种有价值的诊断工具,因为无法识别定性电模式。关于预后,脑电图不能用作标准,因为异常程度与疾病严重程度之间没有关系,而且脑电图不会随着疾病进展而恶化。