Corliss R J, McKenna D H, Crumpton C W, Rowe G G
J Clin Invest. 1968 Aug;47(8):1774-86. doi: 10.1172/JCI105867.
Systemic and coronary hemodynamic parameters were determined during an arrhythmia and immediately after a direct current transthoracic shock given in an attempt to convert the arrhythmia to a sinus mechanism. No anesthesia or drugs were administered between the two studies. 16 patients with atrial fibrillation converted to sinus rhythm and five did not. In two patients with atrial flutter and one with supraventricular tachycardia, the arrhythmia was corrected. The arrhythmia persisted in a single patient with ventricular tachycardia. Utilizing each patient as his own control, we compared statistically various hemodynamic parameters before and after the shock. In addition, the group of patients whose atrial fibrillation terminated was compared to the group treated in the same manner but in which the atrial fibrillation persisted. Pressures in the right side of the heart decreased in both groups so that the changes appeared to be caused by factors associated with the transthoracic direct current shock or the catheterization procedure. The differences between those with atrial fibrillation who converted to sinus rhythm as compared to those who did not were a decrease in heart rate, an increase in stroke volume, and an increase in cardiac efficiency. There was no immediate effect on the cardiac output or coronary blood flow.
在心律失常期间以及尝试通过经胸直流电休克将心律失常转为窦性心律后立即测定全身和冠状动脉血流动力学参数。两项研究之间未给予麻醉或药物。16例房颤患者转为窦性心律,5例未转复。2例房扑患者和1例室上性心动过速患者的心律失常得到纠正。1例室性心动过速患者的心律失常持续存在。以每位患者自身作为对照,我们对休克前后的各种血流动力学参数进行了统计学比较。此外,将房颤终止的患者组与以相同方式治疗但房颤持续的患者组进行了比较。两组患者右心压力均降低,因此这些变化似乎是由与经胸直流电休克或导管插入术相关的因素引起的。转为窦性心律的房颤患者与未转复的患者之间的差异在于心率降低、每搏量增加和心脏效率提高。对心输出量或冠状动脉血流量没有立即影响。