Paul E F, Paul J
J Med Ethics. 1979 Sep;5(3):133-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.5.3.133.
Doctors have been placed in an anomalous position by abortion laws which sanction the termination of a fetus while in a woman's womb, yet call it murder when a physician attempts to end the life of a fetus which has somehow survived such a procedure. This predicament, the doctors' dilemma, can be resolved by adopting a strategy which posits the right to ownership of one's own body for human beings. Such an approach will generate a consistent policy prescription, one that sanctions the right of all pregnant women to abortions, yet grants the fetus, after it becomes viable as a potentially independent person, a right to its own body. The doctors' dilemma is surmounted, then, by requiring that abortions of viable fetuses be performed in a manner that will produce a live delivery. Hence, infanticide and termination of viable fetuses are proscribed.
堕胎法让医生陷入了一种异常的境地。这些法律批准在女性子宫内终止胎儿生命,然而当一名医生试图结束一个在这样的手术中存活下来的胎儿的生命时,却称这为谋杀。这种困境,即医生的两难处境,可以通过采用一种策略来解决,该策略假定人类拥有对自己身体的所有权。这样一种方法将产生一个一致的政策规定,即批准所有孕妇堕胎的权利,但在胎儿作为一个潜在独立的人具有生存能力后,赋予其对自己身体的权利。那么,通过要求以能实现活体分娩的方式对具有生存能力的胎儿进行堕胎,医生的两难处境就得以克服。因此,杀婴和终止具有生存能力的胎儿的生命是被禁止的。