Ariel I M
J Surg Oncol. 1979;12(2):137-53. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930120208.
A retrospective study of 1,178 females suffering from cancer of the breast and treated by radical mastectomy is presented. All operations were performed by essentially one group of four senior surgeons, each either trained or connected with Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital in New York and spent practically all of his professional career in the treatment of cancer. The same techniques of surgery were practiced. The same principles of the overall treatment were utilized; namely, if there were no metastases to lymph nodes detected on histologic studies, no radiation therapy was given. If metastases were present in the axillary lymph nodes, each of the patients received postoperative radiation therapy. None received either chemotherapy nor immunotherapy, as primary treatment. The study includes all patients treated between 1930 and 1965 and complete follow-up data were obtained in 94.6% of all patients. Five hundred and ninety-six patients were classified histologically as Stage I (50.6%), 291 as Stage II (24.7%), 74 as Stage III (6.3%), and 217 patients (18.4%) were undetermined. The total number of patients who developed a second primary cancer in the remaining breast was 91 (7.7%), and only 51 patients (4.3%) developed local recurrences in the chest wall or axilla. The mean age of the patients was 51.9 years. The absolute 5-year survival of all patients was 64% and the 10-year survival equaled 54.6%. The 9.4% mortality between the 5- and 10-year survival emphasizes that the 10-year survival figures are a more accurate index of survival. The larger the tumor, usually the poorer the prognosis, except where the tumor was 8 cm or larger where the prognosis was rather good. This indicates some biologic resistance to the tumor, making patients with large tumors candidates for "curative" radical mastectomy. The delay in seeking treatment had minimal effect on the overall survival. Staging had a significant effect and the 5-year survival for the Stage I group was 81.7% which declined to 60.3% at the 10-year period. In the Stage II group, these values were less and averaged 63.7% 5-year survival and 47.2% 10-year survival. The 74 patients wiival at the 10-year period. It is concluded that radical mastectomy plays an important role in curing a significant number of patients with breast cancer. Whether it should be abandoned for more conservative surgery is a matter which further studies will indicate. This study presents a baseline investigation, under a more-or-less standard clinical situation for evaluating the accomplishments of the radical mastectomy.
本文呈现了一项对1178例接受根治性乳房切除术的乳腺癌女性患者的回顾性研究。所有手术基本由一组四名资深外科医生完成,他们每位都曾在纽约纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心接受培训或与之有联系,并且几乎整个职业生涯都致力于癌症治疗。手术采用相同的技术,整体治疗遵循相同的原则,即如果组织学检查未发现淋巴结转移,则不进行放射治疗。如果腋窝淋巴结存在转移,每位患者均接受术后放射治疗。作为主要治疗手段,无人接受化疗或免疫治疗。该研究涵盖了1930年至1965年间接受治疗的所有患者,94.6%的患者获得了完整的随访数据。596例患者组织学分类为I期(50.6%),291例为II期(24.7%),74例为III期(6.3%),217例患者(18.4%)分期未确定。其余乳房发生第二原发性癌的患者总数为91例(7.7%),仅51例患者(4.3%)出现胸壁或腋窝局部复发。患者的平均年龄为51.9岁。所有患者的5年绝对生存率为64%,10年生存率为54.6%。5年至10年生存率之间9.4%的死亡率表明,10年生存率数据是更准确的生存指标。通常肿瘤越大,预后越差,但肿瘤为8厘米或更大时预后相当好。这表明对肿瘤存在某种生物学抗性,使得大肿瘤患者适合接受“根治性”乳房切除术。寻求治疗的延迟对总体生存影响极小。分期有显著影响,I期组的5年生存率为81.7%,10年时降至60.3%。在II期组中,这些数值较低,5年生存率平均为63.7%,10年生存率为47.2%。74例患者在10年时存活。结论是根治性乳房切除术在治愈大量乳腺癌患者中发挥着重要作用。是否应放弃根治性乳房切除术而采用更保守的手术方式,这一问题有待进一步研究揭示。本研究在或多或少标准的临床情况下进行了基线调查,以评估根治性乳房切除术的成效。