The decline of NIH's peer-review system?
作者信息
Hecht F
出版信息
N Engl J Med. 1979 Nov 8;301(19):1068. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197911083011925.
PMID:492248
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The decline of NIH's peer-review system?美国国立卫生研究院同行评审系统的衰落？
N Engl J Med. 1979 Nov 8;301(19):1068. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197911083011925.
2
Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation: commentary.
Man Med. 1978;3(3):213-20.
3
Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
Man Med. 1978;3(3):201-9.
4
Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended.生物医学政治。性研究遭谴责，国立卫生研究院同行评审程序获辩护。
Science. 2003 Nov 7;302(5647):966-7. doi: 10.1126/science.302.5647.966a.
5
Researchers discuss NIH's nanotechnology initiative.研究人员讨论美国国立卫生研究院的纳米技术倡议。
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Aug;18(8):821. doi: 10.1038/78418.
6
Appropriations. House bill signals the end of NIH's double-digit growth.拨款。众议院法案标志着美国国立卫生研究院两位数增长的结束。
Science. 2003 Jun 27;300(5628):2019. doi: 10.1126/science.300.5628.2019a.
7
Gold out of lead? The NIH's new "financial management plan".化铅为金？美国国立卫生研究院的新“财务管理计划”。
New Biol. 1991 Mar;3(3):199-202.
8
ASPB's response to the NIH's Public Access Policy.美国植物生物学家学会对美国国立卫生研究院公共获取政策的回应。
Plant Physiol. 2005 Jun;138(2):540-1. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.900161.
9
Scientific publishing. NIH's peer review stands up to scrutiny.
Science. 2015 Apr 24;348(6233):384. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6233.384.
10
The peer review system.同行评审系统。
Fed Proc. 1980 May 15;39(7):2349.
Zotero 插件