• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倡导的神话。

The myth of advocacy.

作者信息

Stone A A

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1979 Dec;30(12):819-22. doi: 10.1176/ps.30.12.819.

DOI:10.1176/ps.30.12.819
PMID:500019
Abstract

In an era in which advocacy has become a buzzword, both psychiatry and the legal profession have climbed aboard the advocacy bandwagon. Yet the American Psychiatric Association's notion of advocacy--championing the medical needs of patients--is often in direct conflict with the lawyers' notion of advocacy--championing the legal rights of their clients. The author observes that psychiatry has proved to be a weak adversary for patients' legal advocates; the result has been a one-sided advocacy system that has advanced patients' rights at the expense of their needs. He believes that if the APA is to become an effective advocate for patients, it must hire lawyers and work with them to reverse the trend of turning rights into needs.

摘要

在一个倡导已成为流行语的时代,精神病学和法律行业都搭上了倡导的潮流。然而,美国精神病学协会的倡导理念——捍卫患者的医疗需求——往往与律师的倡导理念——捍卫其客户的合法权利——直接冲突。作者指出,事实证明,精神病学在患者的法律辩护人面前是一个软弱的对手;结果导致了一个片面的倡导体系,该体系以牺牲患者需求为代价推进了患者权利。他认为,如果美国精神病学协会要成为患者的有效倡导者,就必须聘请律师并与他们合作,以扭转将权利转化为需求的趋势。

相似文献

1
The myth of advocacy.倡导的神话。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1979 Dec;30(12):819-22. doi: 10.1176/ps.30.12.819.
2
APA's model commitment law and the need for better mental health services.美国心理学会的模范承诺法与改善心理健康服务的必要性。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Sep;36(9):978-80. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.9.978.
3
Patients' rights raises questions for psychology, psychiatry and law.患者权利给心理学、精神病学和法律提出了问题。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1981;27(1):37-42. doi: 10.1177/002076408102700105.
4
The American Psychiatric Association's proposals on civil commitment.美国精神病学协会关于民事监护的提议。
Clgh Rev. 1983 Oct;17(5):558-62.
5
The right to refuse medical treatment.拒绝医疗治疗的权利。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1991 Spring;36(1):147-53.
6
[The rights of citizens while being delivered psychiatric care].[公民在接受精神科护理时的权利]
Voen Med Zh. 2000 Feb;321(2):77-80.
7
A response to comments on APA's model commitment law.对美国心理学协会模范承诺法相关评论的回应。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Sep;36(9):984-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.9.984.
8
The new Russian law on psychiatric care.俄罗斯关于精神科护理的新法律。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 1994 Apr-Jun;30(2):15-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.1994.tb00230.x.
9
Physicians as advocates.作为倡导者的医生。
Houst Law Rev. 1999 Spring;35(5):1529-1630.
10
Commentary: legal analysis of the Israel Psychiatric Association's proposal regarding compulsory hospitalization of the mentally Ill.评论:对以色列精神病学协会关于精神病患者强制住院治疗提案的法律分析
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2000;37(4):262-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient autonomy, paternalism, and the conscientious physician.患者自主权、家长式作风与尽责的医生。
Theor Med. 1983 Oct;4(3):253-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00489208.
2
Mental patient advocacy by a patient advocate.患者权益倡导者对精神病患者的权益倡导。
Psychiatr Q. 1982 Fall;54(3):169-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01064759.
3
The lawyer as mental health professional.作为心理健康专业人员的律师。
Psychiatr Q. 1982 Fall;54(3):163-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01064758.
4
Of the shared responsibility for civil commitment.关于民事收容的共同责任。
Psychiatr Q. 1982 Spring;54(1):38-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01064727.
5
Ethical aspects of the right to refuse medication: a clinicolegal dilemma for the psychiatrist and patient.拒绝用药权利的伦理问题:精神科医生与患者面临的临床法律困境。
Psychiatr Q. 1981 Summer;53(2):93-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01064892.
6
Is psychiatry being harmed by involuntary hospitalization and treatment?非自愿住院治疗是否正在损害精神病学?
CMAJ. 1987 Jul 1;137(1):17-20.