Tsushima W T, Wedding D
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979 Nov;167(11):704-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197911000-00008.
An attempt was made to compare the diagnostic conclusions of the Halstead-Reitan battery with the diagnosis of the computerized tomography (CT) scanner), which has recently created profound changes in neuroradiological practice. Subjects were 45 patients whose neurological diagnosis was used as a criterion for CT, EEG, and three Halstead-Reitan diagnostic statements (Halstead Impairment Index, Rennick Average Impairment Rating, and clinical interpretation). Results indicated no false positive errors with the CT and the highest overall accuracy rate with a clinical interpretation of the Halstead-Reitan tests. The complementary roles of these varied neurodiagnostic methods, which provide different kinds of pertinent neurological information, are stressed.
研究人员尝试将霍尔斯特德-雷坦成套神经心理测验的诊断结论与计算机断层扫描（CT）的诊断结果进行比较，CT最近给神经放射学实践带来了深刻变革。研究对象为45名患者，其神经学诊断被用作CT、脑电图以及三项霍尔斯特德-雷坦诊断指标（霍尔斯特德损伤指数、伦尼克平均损伤评分和临床解释）的评判标准。结果表明，CT没有出现假阳性错误，而对霍尔斯特德-雷坦测验进行临床解释时总体准确率最高。强调了这些不同神经诊断方法的互补作用，它们能提供不同类型的相关神经学信息。
