Goldberg R, Szklo M, Tonascia J, Kennedy H L
Johns Hopkins Med J. 1979 Nov;145(5):187-91.
We performed a community-wide study in metropolitan Baltimore to examine the prognostic role of length of time between hospital admission and ventricular fibrillation or cardiac arrest (VFib/CA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI). Risk of developing VFib/CA was particularly marked in the first few hours after admission to the hospital. We compared 128 patients experiencing VFib/CA within 48 hours of admission and 80 patients developing these complications after more than 48 hours. Patients with "early" VFib/CA exhibited a lower in-hospital case-fatality rate than those with "late" VBib/CA (67% versus 88%; p less than .01). Likewise, of patients discharged alive from the hospital and followed for as long as six years a greater proportion of the 38 with histories of "early" VFib/CA survived than of the 11 who had experienced "late" VFib/CA during hospital admission (.05 less than p less than .10). These results suggest that whereas "early" VFib/CA may reflect transitory myocardial electrical instability, "late" VFib/CA may indicate chronic instability and thus imply a poor prognosis.
我们在巴尔的摩大都市地区开展了一项全社区范围的研究,以探讨急性心肌梗死(MI)并发心室颤动或心脏骤停(VFib/CA)时,入院时间与VFib/CA之间的时间长度所起的预后作用。入院后头几个小时内发生VFib/CA的风险尤为显著。我们比较了入院48小时内发生VFib/CA的128例患者和48小时后发生这些并发症的80例患者。“早期”发生VFib/CA的患者院内病死率低于“晚期”发生VFib/CA的患者(67% 对88%;p小于0.01)。同样,在从医院存活出院并随访长达6年的患者中,有“早期”VFib/CA病史的38例患者的存活比例高于入院期间经历“晚期”VFib/CA的11例患者(0.05小于p小于0.10)。这些结果表明,“早期”VFib/CA可能反映短暂的心肌电不稳定,而“晚期”VFib/CA可能提示慢性不稳定,因此预后不良。