Wilkins J, Leedom J M, Salvatore M A, Portnoy B
Calif Med. 1971 Nov;115(5):16-22.
The report presents evidence of the transmission of hpv-77 derived rubella vaccine virus from vaccinees to two susceptible contacts. The first instance of transmission was to a child who served as a transmission control on a "closed" study ward, and the second was to an antibody-negative mother in an "open" family study. Neither of these persons had any clinical evidence of rubella. Both had significant increases in rubella hemagglutination inhibiting (hai) antibody titers, but detectable complement fixing (cf) antibodies did not develop in either. With the kind of antigen used in our rubella cf test, this pattern of serologic response is characteristic of, but not diagnostic of, infection with the rubella vaccine virus. The serological evidence which was compatible with rubella vaccine virus infection, the complete absence of serologic or clinical evidence of "wild" rubella virus infections among the other four rubella susceptible transmission control children and the security precautions employed to ensure isolation on the "closed" ward, make "wild" rubella virus infection extremely unlikely. The evidence for rubella vaccine virus infection in the other susceptible contact is not as conclusive, because "wild" rubella virus infection is difficult to rule out in any person living in an "open" family situation. Nevertheless the need for more data is emphasized by the virtual certainty that rubella vaccine virus transmission did occur in the subject on the isolation ward, plus the high probability that the infection observed in the family group setting also represented transmission of rubella vaccine virus. Such data can only come from close surveillance of recipients of live rubella virus vaccines and their contacts in the future.
该报告提供了证据,证明源自HPV - 77的风疹疫苗病毒从接种疫苗者传播给了两名易感接触者。首例传播发生在一名在“封闭”研究病房担任传播对照的儿童身上,第二例发生在“开放”家庭研究中的一名抗体阴性母亲身上。这两人均无风疹的临床证据。两人的风疹血凝抑制(HAI)抗体滴度均显著升高,但两人均未产生可检测到的补体结合(CF)抗体。对于我们风疹CF试验中使用的那种抗原,这种血清学反应模式是风疹疫苗病毒感染的特征,但并非诊断依据。与风疹疫苗病毒感染相符的血清学证据、其他四名风疹易感传播对照儿童中完全没有“野生”风疹病毒感染的血清学或临床证据,以及在“封闭”病房采取的确保隔离的安全防范措施,使得“野生”风疹病毒感染极不可能。另一名易感接触者中风疹疫苗病毒感染的证据不那么确凿,因为在任何生活在“开放”家庭环境中的人中都难以排除“野生”风疹病毒感染。然而,鉴于在隔离病房的受试者中风疹疫苗病毒传播确实发生的几乎确定性,以及在家庭群组环境中观察到的感染也极有可能代表风疹疫苗病毒传播,强调了需要更多数据。此类数据只能来自未来对风疹活疫苗接种者及其接触者的密切监测。