Selzer A, Anderson W L, March H W
Calif Med. 1971 Nov;115(5):1-6.
Coronary arteriography has become a diagnostic procedure which is no longer limited to major medical centers but is being performed in many community hospitals. The procedure carries an appreciable risk, which is only justifiable by specific benefits to the patient. The benefits are related to the potential availability of newer surgical procedures of bypassing obstructive coronary arterial lesions. A specific set of criteria for the performance of coronary arteriography has been developed from a critical analysis of the ratio of risk to benefit. A survey of the risk of coronary arteriography indicates that mortality increases at least twentyfold and morbidity sixfold when this procedure is performed in laboratories with a low caseload as compared with high caseload institutions. Thus there appears to be no justification for performing coronary arteriography in the absence of proper team facilities.
冠状动脉造影已成为一种诊断程序,它不再局限于大型医疗中心,许多社区医院也在开展此项检查。该检查存在相当大的风险,只有在对患者有明确益处时才具有合理性。这些益处与通过更新的外科手术绕过阻塞性冠状动脉病变的潜在可行性有关。通过对风险效益比进行批判性分析,制定了一套特定的冠状动脉造影检查标准。一项关于冠状动脉造影风险的调查表明,与高病例量机构相比,在病例量低的实验室进行此项检查时,死亡率至少增加20倍,发病率增加6倍。因此,在缺乏适当团队设施的情况下进行冠状动脉造影似乎没有道理。