Hampton D, Ventry I M
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Dec;22(4):717-30. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2204.717.
Using the Bekesy tracking method for loudness judgement tasks such as most comfortable loudness (MCL) and recalled loudness (RL) measurements, normal listeners have tracked continuous (C) tones at lesser intensities than interrupted (I) tones. The resulting continuous/interrupted (C/I) separations have ranged up to 22 dB. Explanations of the unexpected C/I separations have not been in agreement. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether psychophysical method has a significant effect on the C/I separation. Subjects were six normal-hearing adults, each of whom participated in three practice and ten test sessions of one hour each. Thirty-six experimental conditions were presented. The test signals were C tones, 200/200 msec I tones and 200/800 msec I tones, all at 1 kHz. The reference intensities wer 20, 50 and 80 dB SPL. The four methods were Bekesy tracking method (BTM), method of adjustment (MAdj), method of limits (ML) and method of constant stimuli difference (MCSD). Mean values for Point of Subjective Equality and C/I separation were calculated. C/I separations obtained with the BTM were significantly larger than C/I separations obtained with any other psychophysical method. These results demonstrate that C/I separations obtained during suprathreshold Bekesy tracking tasks by normal hearers are largely caused by the measurement method itself rather than by differences in C and I tone loudness. Time order errors could explain the BTM effect.
在使用贝凯西跟踪法进行响度判断任务时,比如最舒适响度(MCL)和回忆响度(RL)测量,正常听力的受试者追踪连续(C)音时的强度低于间断(I)音。由此产生的连续/间断(C/I)差值可达22分贝。对于这种意外的C/I差值,各种解释并不一致。本研究的目的是调查心理物理学方法是否对C/I差值有显著影响。受试者为六名听力正常的成年人,每人参加三次各一小时的练习环节和十次各一小时的测试环节。共呈现了36种实验条件。测试信号为1千赫的C音、200/200毫秒I音和200/800毫秒I音。参考强度为20、50和80分贝声压级。四种方法分别是贝凯西跟踪法(BTM)、调整法(MAdj)、极限法(ML)和恒定刺激差异法(MCSD)。计算了主观等响度点和C/I差值的平均值。用BTM获得的C/I差值显著大于用任何其他心理物理学方法获得的C/I差值。这些结果表明,正常听力者在阈上贝凯西跟踪任务中获得的C/I差值很大程度上是由测量方法本身造成的,而非C音和I音响度的差异。时间顺序误差可以解释BTM效应。